What defensive focus works best?

Hello,

we looked at the statistics of the most used defensive tactics in the game and I would like to share the results.

 

Defensive focus


BasketPulse deflectionsWhat is the most widely used focus?

Most often, teams choose to play without focusing on the specific strength of their opponents and choose a Normal focus. The use of Shooters defensive focus has increased significantly this past season.





Home advantage
 

Basketpulse stealsWhat works best?

Despite teams using the Normal option the most, this tactic is only the fourth most effective. Teams that chose to emphasize defense against shooters won most of the games - 54%.

The latest version of the engine has reduced the number of deflections when passing the ball to the low post, which has reduced the effectiveness of low-post defensive focus.

Meanwhile, the least used tactic to focus on the opponent's playmakers gave the worst result - only 36% of victories.





Free throw accuracy

Basketpulse steals

What are we going to change?

We are going to increase the efficiency of defensive focus on playmakers and leader by skills.

 


 

 

PRO TIP. Many players face the problem of a foul trouble. The amount of fouls can be reduced by changing the defensive and role tactics of the player.

Do you want to learn more?

In the course of this update, we will share various statistics related to the updates on our Facebook account. We invite you to follow us on Facebook for all the latest information about the game!

 

We really appreciate community's help on making the game more popular. We would really appreciate your upvote in newRPG,com!


What defensive focus works best?
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
Show hidden replies: 36
siūlau panagrinėti statistiką kažkiek giliau ir tikslingiau bei atlikti balansavimus: 1) kiek vidutiniškai taškų skirtumo sudaro, jei ta pati komanda, bet trenerio įgūdžiai skiriasi per vieną ar kelis balus. Koks standartinis nuokrypis, 2) tas pats su arenos atmosfera, 3) taktika: kaip keičiasi rezultatas tarp tų pačių komandų, kai pvz puola per metikus, o ginasi a) prieš lyderį, b) prieš metikus, c) po krepšiu, d) normalus. Ir tas pats medis su kitom puolimo taktikom. 4) random - koks standartinis nuokrypis per varžybas. Tik kad šitą analizuoti reikia imti kelias komandas, kelis atvejus ir tą patį runninti daug kartų, tada bus aišku koks efektas gaunasi iš kiekvienos srities, kai visi kiti faktoriai nesikeičia. Pagal galima klausti feedback, kur bendruomenė norėtų daugiau balanso. -- 91 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+12
Thanks for the analysis, but I just hope we can have a more stable game engine in the near future, I don't care if it emphasizes the offense or defense, shooters or low-post, and etc. It affects the way we read the tactics and train our player. It takes a long period to train a player in this game, and nobody wants to see his gem becomes jam after ten seasons of training. I understand Darius and his team want to update the engine every season in order to build a "perfect" engine, but there is no such engine that satisfies every user. -- 91 S 11 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
d0man Morrow we will review the amount of fouls by type, we will share more information about our findings when we have them.
fortuzas BearBear ekstrasensas Formatas Please share a link to the game and specify what is wrong and how it could be changed via message administration function.
joancrumor david1992 I'm glad that you like the colour graphics! And we hear you about the stress of playing with two game engines. We understand that it can be frustrating not having everything fully up to date and working optimally. But rest assured, we're working on updates and improvements behind the scenes, and we're doing our best to get everything running smoothly as soon as possible. Unfortunately, we can't give you an exact timeline for when the updates will be finished, but we'll make sure to keep you informed as we make progress. In the meantime, we hope you're still having fun with the game!
Gudrioji Lape thank you for your suggestions, we are working on the suggestion 3) and we will share the results as soon as we have them. :)
-- 91 S 11 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0