Recientemente, hemos estado haciendo algunos cambios en el motor de juego y me gustaría compartir los resultados.
La opinión de nuestros jugadores es muy importante para nosotros. Así que os invitamos a compartir vuestra opinión en los comentarios sobre el
impacto de la aleatoriedad en el juego.
|
|
CAMBIOS HECHOS EN EL MOTOR DE PRUEBAS
|
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_632c567404b00
Partidos
--
89 S
51 Dia
Partidos
Gudrioji Lape The way I understood "increasing the influence of safeguards" is that the chance to miss increases with every consecutive made shot (I think from 3, mostly?). So the more shots are successful in a row, the higher the chances to miss will be on the next shot. I personally don't like this option because it feels too set in stone. At least randomness is.. well.. random.
--
89 S
51 Dia
nofixations Partidos
Zalgiriukas nofixations Psubrat jurgensons Frankebasta, the bug regarding the rebound has been fixed, thank you for sharing. smart0eddie ak904 it is referred to a number of lucky shots - 1 in 4 of three pointers are luck determined, while ±1 in 8 of close-range shots are. The way it currectly works, every single shot has the same chance of luck, i.e. every single three-pointer will have 1 in 4 chance of being decided by luck and currently the safeguards effect is little. Sport science says it should be that way, as most players do not get a hot hand, it's just getting lucky to score above average and then in going back to the mean with cold streaks (
https://www.pitt.edu/pittwire/features-articles/hot-hand-phenomenon-basketball-real#:~:text=In%20our%20recent%20study%2C%20we,following%20two%20shots%20made%20consecutively.). Gudrioji Lape there are a lot of factors that have an influence on the game outcome, two games will never be the same just the way it is in real life. I remember last year there's been games in NKL playoffs where there would be 40 points difference between two games separated by two or three days. Frankebasta we will make less changes now, we want to see how the updates work and we will make slight adjustments if necessary and we will inform the community. elprof positive luck factor is smaller compared to negative factor, i.e. missing shots. The positive influence could be made bigger, however, that would make the skills of the players less important. Gudrioji Lape I will send the translated part of the explanation what the safeguards are: Atsitiktinumo įtaką galėtume sumažinti įvesdami saugiklius žaidime - jei žaidėjas pataikė 5/5 tritaškių, tikimybė pramesti šeštą būtų labai didelė. So, for example, if a player hits a lot of threes in the first half, at the end of the game he will be more likely to miss those shots purely based on the fact that has made a lot of shots in the beginning of the game. We believe it does not make sense and sport science does not support this idea, as described in the reply to smart0eddie.
--
89 S
52 Dia
Partidos
--
89 S
52 Dia
dwyane3 Thank you for answering! I understand that making luck a bigger factor would make skills have a lesser impact, but isn't the same true for unlucky shots? My last friendly game there were 12 total, 10 of which were from my team. That's a minimum of 20 points and we lost by 9. I guess I'm requesting a second opinion on whether unlucky shots are influencing the game too much. It might even be worth exploring lowering the unlucky/lucky influence in higher leagues but not in lower leagues, due to general lower skill level. This is just my personal opinion though and of course I will accept whatever is settled on, I'm just offering my perspective. :) Thank you for being so interactive and listening to all of us.
--
89 S
52 Dia
Rurutis I'm not quite sure what you're talking about. Sounds like you're confusing me with someone else. Try not to make random allegations please, I would very much like my experience with this game to not be affected by something completely unrelated.
--
89 S
52 Dia
Partidos
--
89 S
53 Dia
Partidos
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_632c567404b00
--
89 S
53 Dia
Gudrioji Lape randomness has an impact on the game events but saying that it can cause 20 points per game is a strong statement. If that was the case we would have much stronger teams losing to weaker teams constantly. Jardabudy glad to hear that! https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_632c567404b00 Aurimas this is unfortunate indeed, we will probably add a safety guard that no more than 30% of each player's shots can be determined by randomness per game to avoid situations like that. elprof yes, that's quite a big number of random effect, as mentioned above we are planning to control that by putting a 30% cap on the random-caused misses. TheWizardKs thanks! Do you have 3pt skill influence on 2pt accuracy? I think that we've had this idea discussed with the community a number of times. Shooting from different ranges is a different skill and if excellent performance is expected, then the skill must be trained to a certain level. We have merged free-throw and mid-range skills in the past and we are not planning on making further adjustments. nofixations All these factors already have an influence on the game events, you may see atmosphere and tiredness effects in the chronology of the game. Even if we took all random shots away there would still be randomness left in almost every single element of the game. It's not going to happen that a great shooter will make 100% of his 3 pointers attempted. Psubrat time is usually consumed by PG, especially when the player has offensive setting set at playmaking. Could you share an example when SG was consuming time? Liverduk this is a normal number. It is not going to happen every game though, the average in the game is around 14. smart0eddie that's what random is, sometimes you get a 3pt shooting streak, sometimes you don't. In the long run it always goes back to the mean average accuracy. Kisuke are there enough players to fill in the set minutes for all positions? What happens if you put DNP? Slixzy16 bananajohn TheWizardKs there is no zone defense in the game anymore as such. It is very rare that team would play zone for the whole game in reality. We will look in to ways to include zone defense in the game with the upcoming match engine updates.
--
89 S
57 Dia
fungtys I believe we have too many tall players in the game and we have actually recently lowered the chance of the player to be a 7-footer. We have to many tall players in the game and that causes the tall players to have similar skills to the short players making short players less useful. We have tested short SG/SF players in the new engine and they were performing much better than in the previous version. As soon as more users try using them more often, especially in the higher leagues, we will see if further adjustments are necessary. Frankebasta if the player is coached as a PG and he was a LJB height, he could play PG in the game as well. I have 2.02cm PG that is making 5ast per game, last season 7.3 ast per game in WL2. He might not be the best example but it shows that you may train the players to play certain way if you want.
--
89 S
57 Dia
dwyane3: "if the player is coached as a PG and he was a LJB height, he could play PG"
Partidos Partidos
Frankebasta 1. Paguinto is set as leader in the tactics, therefore he got the ball in the last posession. Likewise with Pereira. fungtys smaller centers are faster but not as strong. Playing 1on1 on the low post might be hard to be successful unless the skills are much better. On the other hand short center may be advantageous if he's guarded on a 3pt line and drives towards the basket, especially with better skills in athletics. Likewise for the 3pt accuracy - the same skills work for the shorter players' accuracy as for the tall one, in order for the short player to succeed his skills that determine 3pt accuracy must be better than the taller player's. joancrumor we do not have a date set in stone. Darius is working full-time on coding the match engine right now, as soon as we feel that the ME is well-balanced we will shift our focus elsewhere.
--
89 S
58 Dia
joancrumor we have received much more feedback than previously, therefore we are able to tackle the challenging parts of the ME faster now. I understand this is not optimal and we have moved forward significantly this year with the ME and it is live in the NL already. nofixations we want to finish the current engine update as soon as possible and I hope it is more enjoyable to the majority of the users as soon as possible.
--
89 S
60 Dia
a-ramune dwyane3 how about 1st league in National League incomes? Now is better stay in 2nd división un top half than out of playoffs in 1st. Nobody want to go to 1st for that reason. Maybe you should improve attendance because is a nosense right now
--
89 S
60 Dia
john1 smart0eddie we will share how the new tiredness and shape work together tomorrow in the news. ulipulido thank you for the suggestion, we will think how to make it better.
--
89 S
63 Dia
Partidos
--
90 S
7 Dia
Más tapones
Efecto de la aleatoriedad
4.4
2.1
2.2
1.1
2.2
1.1
1.1
1.1
2.2
1.1
2.1
1.1
1.1