交易資訊
退回
| 資訊 | |
|---|---|
| 協商開始 | 2020-04-23- 22:20 |
| 協商結束 | 2020-04-23- 22:43 |
| 限制等級 | |
|
Kalnius Lakštinis | |||
| 薪資: | 3122 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 24 歲 | |
| RT: | 208 | 身高: | 176 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 8 | |||
|
|
Vincentas Deveikis | |||
| 薪資: | 6111 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 23 歲 | |
| RT: | 188 | 身高: | 194 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 8 | |||
|
|
Ricardo Lozano | |||
| 薪資: | 6000 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 34 歲 | |
| RT: | 203 | 身高: | 204 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
|
|
Tautvilas Kreivaitis | |||
| 薪資: | - | |||
| 合約: | 學校潛力新秀 | 年齡: | 15 歲 | |
| RT: | 65 | 身高: | 189 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 10 | |||
1.1
交易/租借球員:
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 5
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
75 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
75 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />
--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 賽季 27 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 賽季 27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
