Csere információi
Visszavont
| Információk | |
|---|---|
| A tárgyalás kezdete | 2020-04-23- 22:20 |
| A tárgyalás befejezése | 2020-04-23- 22:43 |
| Korlátozási szint | |
|
Kalnius Lakštinis | |||
| Fizetés: | 3122 Eu | |||
| Szerződés: | 1 Sz | Életkor: | 24 év | |
| ERŐ: | 208 | Magasság: | 176 cm. | |
| Tehetség: | 8 | |||
|
|
Vincentas Deveikis | |||
| Fizetés: | 6111 Eu | |||
| Szerződés: | 1 Sz | Életkor: | 23 év | |
| ERŐ: | 188 | Magasság: | 194 cm. | |
| Tehetség: | 8 | |||
|
|
Ricardo Lozano | |||
| Fizetés: | 6000 Eu | |||
| Szerződés: | 1 Sz | Életkor: | 34 év | |
| ERŐ: | 203 | Magasság: | 204 cm. | |
| Tehetség: | 3 | |||
|
|
Tautvilas Kreivaitis | |||
| Fizetés: | - | |||
| Szerződés: | Akad. tehetség | Életkor: | 15 év | |
| ERŐ: | 65 | Magasság: | 189 cm. | |
| Tehetség: | 10 | |||
2.2
Csere/Kölcsönadott játékosok:
+0
Elrejtett válaszok megtekintése: 5
A Fair play bizottság visszavonta a cserét
--
75 Sz
27 n.
--
(Fordítás)
(Fordítás EN)
+0
A Fair play bizottság úgy döntött, hogy a csere sportszerűtlen, és a csapatokat figyelmeztetésben részesítik.
--
75 Sz
27 n.
--
(Fordítás)
(Fordítás EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />
--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 Sz 27 n.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 Sz 27 n.
--
(Fordítás)
(Fordítás EN)
+0
