記者會
2.2
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受
--
75 賽季
25 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
75 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
75 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />
--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 賽季 27 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 賽季 27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0