Informationen über den Trade
zurückgenommen
Informationen | |
---|---|
Verhandlungsbeginn | 2020-04-23- 22:20 |
Ende der Verhandlungen | 2020-04-23- 22:43 |
Beschränkungsstufe |
|
Kalnius Lakštinis | |||
Gehalt: | 3122 Eu | |||
Vertrag: | 1 S | Alter: | 24 J. | |
RT: | 208 | Größe: | 176 cm. | |
Potenzial: | 8 | |||
|
Vincentas Deveikis | |||
Gehalt: | 6111 Eu | |||
Vertrag: | 1 S | Alter: | 23 J. | |
RT: | 188 | Größe: | 194 cm. | |
Potenzial: | 8 |
|
Ricardo Lozano | |||
Gehalt: | 6000 Eu | |||
Vertrag: | 1 S | Alter: | 34 J. | |
RT: | 203 | Größe: | 204 cm. | |
Potenzial: | 3 | |||
|
Tautvilas Kreivaitis | |||
Gehalt: | - | |||
Vertrag: | Nachwuchstalent | Alter: | 15 J. | |
RT: | 65 | Größe: | 189 cm. | |
Potenzial: | 10 |
+0
Weitere Antworten zeigen: 5
Der Trade wurde vom Fair-Play-Ausschuss widerrufen.
--
75 S
27 T.
--
(Übersetze)
(Übersetze EN)
+0
Der Fairplay-Ausschuss hat entschieden, dass der Trade unfair ist, und die Mannschaften erhalten eine Verwarnung.
--
75 S
27 T.
--
(Übersetze)
(Übersetze EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022 https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />
--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 S 27 T.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022 https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />
--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 S 27 T.
--
(Übersetze)
(Übersetze EN)
+0