Trade information
Reverted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2020-04-23- 22:20 |
| End of negotiation | 2020-04-23- 22:43 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Kalnius Lakštinis | |||
| Salary: | 3122 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 24 y. | |
| RT: | 208 | Height: | 176 cm. | |
| Potential: | 8 | |||
|
|
Vincentas Deveikis | |||
| Salary: | 6111 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 23 y. | |
| RT: | 188 | Height: | 194 cm. | |
| Potential: | 8 | |||
|
|
Ricardo Lozano | |||
| Salary: | 6000 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 34 y. | |
| RT: | 203 | Height: | 204 cm. | |
| Potential: | 3 | |||
|
|
Tautvilas Kreivaitis | |||
| Salary: | - | |||
| Contract: | School talent | Age: | 15 y. | |
| RT: | 65 | Height: | 189 cm. | |
| Potential: | 10 | |||
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
+0
Show hidden replies: 5
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
75 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning.
--
75 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />
--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 S 27 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 8<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 3<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
4 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- 10 potential school talent is basically given up for two average players. A statement of team FUTURE 2022
https://tinyurl.com/yay7t6eq here indicates it can be gift for a help later.<br />--- Seems extremely unbalanced. We encourage to try and / or give some arguments that explain why both teams gets benefit in this trade.<br />
--- not a fair trade when a pot10 15yo is traded to two average small players<br />
--- Trade is extremely disbalanced as proposed.<br />
-- 75 S 27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
