Trade information

Reverted

Information
Start of negotiation 2019-05-20- 00:15
End of negotiation 2019-05-20- 07:38
Restrictions' level 7
logo
flag Chale Ponte
Salary: 9712 Eu
Contract: 1 S Age: 28 y.
RT: 247 Height: 204 cm.
Potential: 5
Geraldo Ovejas
Salary: 4979 Eu
Contract: 3 S Age: 28 y.
RT: 214 Height: 200 cm.
Potential: 6
logo
Suan Mo
Salary: 8509 Eu
Contract: 1 S Age: 29 y.
RT: 235 Height: 196 cm.
Potential: 7
flag Caton Villaverde
Salary: 11663 Eu
Contract: 4 S Age: 22 y.
RT: 199 Height: 206 cm.
Potential: 9
Icon Trade/Lending players: CB CUCALÓN & Cai Zara
-- 70 S 1 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Show hidden replies: 14
I haven't spoken on this occasion for a long time, but I still want to give you some advice after I see that you have handled similar incidents in the same way as before.

Before FPC was established, I told you that if you can use the automation system, try not to use people to judge the transaction or lease behavior. Because the former only needs to improve its operation mechanism, while the latter, you will face a lot of variables. Because man is not a machine, when his position is wrong, his judgment will be wrong.

In addition, if you use people to judge right and wrong, it is very likely that there will be a problem of inconsistent standards.

I said this calmly, and I hope you can see it calmly. -- 70 S 10 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
The thing with automatic standards is that to close every possible loophole would mean to apply such strict trading restrictions that trading would ne drastically reduced. That's why a committee was created with users from different countries, backgrounds and with different viewpoints. Also, as we in the committee have reiterated on multiple occasions, a reverted trade is not the end of the world; just make a better deal. this was the case with another spanish user this season who after a reverted trade significantly improved his offer. -- 70 S 12 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+4
Here I would like to put forward a different opinion. That is the automated system, not to plug all the loopholes, but to control the loopholes within a certain range and increase the cost of crime. Moreover, although the automation system may be vulnerable, it gives all players a unified standard. It doesn't depend on the player's nationality, rank, or identity. On this basis, administrators only need to improve trading rules, minimize loopholes, make rules less fragile, and increase the cost of crime. In this way, we can get a fairer playing environment.



In addition, I would like to give the FPC an opinion while expressing my respect. That is, players'skill potential should not be used as a criterion for fair trade. Because this potential system is designed by administrators. Some players may be useless, such as 220 cm commander players. However, this is created by the administrator. If this kind of player is garbage, then we should modify the potential system instead of letting the player work hard for a season and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in exchange for a pile of garbage. -- 70 S 15 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1