Информация об обмене

Отменено

Информация
Начало переговоров 2019-05-20- 00:15
Окончание переговоров 2019-05-20- 07:38
Уровень ограничений 7
flag Chale Ponte
Оклад: 9712 Eu
Контракт: 1 сез. Возраст: 28 г.
КС: 247 Рост: 204 см
Потенциал: 5
Geraldo Ovejas
Оклад: 4979 Eu
Контракт: 3 сез. Возраст: 28 г.
КС: 214 Рост: 200 см
Потенциал: 6
Suan Mo
Оклад: 8509 Eu
Контракт: 1 сез. Возраст: 29 г.
КС: 235 Рост: 196 см
Потенциал: 7
flag Caton Villaverde
Оклад: 11663 Eu
Контракт: 4 сез. Возраст: 22 г.
КС: 199 Рост: 206 см
Потенциал: 9
Icon Обмен (Сделка)/Одолжение игроков: CB CUCALÓN & Cai Zara
-- 70 сез. 1 д.
Команда выступила с предложением об обмене
-- (Переводить) (Переводить EN)
+0
Показать скрытые ответы: 14
I haven't spoken on this occasion for a long time, but I still want to give you some advice after I see that you have handled similar incidents in the same way as before.

Before FPC was established, I told you that if you can use the automation system, try not to use people to judge the transaction or lease behavior. Because the former only needs to improve its operation mechanism, while the latter, you will face a lot of variables. Because man is not a machine, when his position is wrong, his judgment will be wrong.

In addition, if you use people to judge right and wrong, it is very likely that there will be a problem of inconsistent standards.

I said this calmly, and I hope you can see it calmly.
-- 70 сез. 10 д.
-- (Переводить) (Переводить EN)
+1
The thing with automatic standards is that to close every possible loophole would mean to apply such strict trading restrictions that trading would ne drastically reduced. That's why a committee was created with users from different countries, backgrounds and with different viewpoints. Also, as we in the committee have reiterated on multiple occasions, a reverted trade is not the end of the world; just make a better deal. this was the case with another spanish user this season who after a reverted trade significantly improved his offer. -- 70 сез. 12 д.
-- (Переводить) (Переводить EN)
+4
Here I would like to put forward a different opinion. That is the automated system, not to plug all the loopholes, but to control the loopholes within a certain range and increase the cost of crime. Moreover, although the automation system may be vulnerable, it gives all players a unified standard. It doesn't depend on the player's nationality, rank, or identity. On this basis, administrators only need to improve trading rules, minimize loopholes, make rules less fragile, and increase the cost of crime. In this way, we can get a fairer playing environment.



In addition, I would like to give the FPC an opinion while expressing my respect. That is, players'skill potential should not be used as a criterion for fair trade. Because this potential system is designed by administrators. Some players may be useless, such as 220 cm commander players. However, this is created by the administrator. If this kind of player is garbage, then we should modify the potential system instead of letting the player work hard for a season and spend hundreds of thousands of dollars in exchange for a pile of garbage.
-- 70 сез. 15 д.
-- (Переводить) (Переводить EN)
+1