Trade information
Accepted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2023-07-18- 10:18 |
| End of negotiation | 2023-07-18- 17:32 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Yannick Renoir
|
|||
| Salary: | 6036 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 3 S | Age: | 23 y. | |
| RT: | 188 | Height: | 206 cm. | |
| Potential: | 9 | |||
|
Chuan Si
|
|||
| Salary: | - | |||
| Contract: | School talent | Age: | 17 y. | |
| RT: | 107 | Height: | 190 cm. | |
| Potential: | 7 | |||
|
Sun Hang Yung
|
|||
| Salary: | - | |||
| Contract: | School talent | Age: | 16 y. | |
| RT: | 93 | Height: | 204 cm. | |
| Potential: | 7 | |||
|
Albericht Muresan
|
|||
| Salary: | 9326 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 18 y. | |
| RT: | 144 | Height: | 186 cm. | |
| Potential: | 10 | |||
1.1
Trade/Lending players:
+0
Show hidden replies: 5
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
94 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 S 19 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 S 19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Hi, i dont really know why the trade was bot aproved, ne and the manager of KK caplje discussed a lot of days how we could make the deal happen. We also had to divide in 2 separate trades because there were many players involved in the trade. There are a lot of benefits for BOTH of us to make this deal happen. Me geting a few young players (and a lot weaker than what i gave) to help me reach WL4 in the near future and for my trade partner to reduce his salary, reduce maintenence of the school and geting a WL1 player in return, also the players he used in this trade werent strong enough for his team anyway. Why is this wrong? Without no explanation the trade didnt passed. Can someone be kind and give me 1 explanation? Thank you :)
--
94 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
