Player information
This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.
x3
x1
x2
x1
Yannick Renoir
- Shape:
- Exhausted
- Age:
- 27 y.
- Height:
- 206 cm. (6' 9'' )
- Position:
- PF (SF)
- Strength rate (RT):
- 253
- Predicted peak RT:
- 282
- Potential:
- 9
Skills
Health
Athletic skill:
Accuracy:
Defence:
Offence:
Contract information
| Term | 4 S |
| Salary | 13 442 Eu |
| Opinion | Excellent |
Market information
| Minimum requested salary | 11 648 Eu |
Drafts information
| League |
World League.3.2
|
| Season | 89 |
| Team | KK caplje megateam |
| Pick no | #17 |
1.1
Player:
+0
+0
Trade/Lending players:
+0
1.1
1.1
+0
Show hidden replies: 4
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
94 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that the trade is unfair and teams are given a warning.
--
94 S
21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 S 21 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 S 21 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
+0
Show hidden replies: 5
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
94 S
19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 S 19 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 S 19 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Hi, i dont really know why the trade was bot aproved, ne and the manager of KK caplje discussed a lot of days how we could make the deal happen. We also had to divide in 2 separate trades because there were many players involved in the trade. There are a lot of benefits for BOTH of us to make this deal happen. Me geting a few young players (and a lot weaker than what i gave) to help me reach WL4 in the near future and for my trade partner to reduce his salary, reduce maintenence of the school and geting a WL1 player in return, also the players he used in this trade werent strong enough for his team anyway. Why is this wrong? Without no explanation the trade didnt passed. Can someone be kind and give me 1 explanation? Thank you :)
--
94 S
20 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
- Shape: Not prepared
- Shape: Almost not prepared
- Shape: Excellent
- Shape: Tired
- Shape: Exhausted
- Not registrable for match
- Franchise player
- Team captain
- School talent
- Player has ended his career
- Club wants to trade this player
- Club doesn't want to trade this player
- Transferring player is currently not allowed
- Player is on loan (contract with another club)
- Is going to end his career in the end of the season
- Good dunker
- Good defender
- Good 3-point shooter
- Good playmaker
- Gold medal
- Silver medal
- Bronze medal
- MVP of the season
- In season's TOP5
- The most perspective in league
- Participant of the All Star day