交易資訊

接受

資訊
協商開始 2023-07-18- 10:18
協商結束 2023-07-18- 17:32
限制等級 7
flag Yannick Renoir
薪資: 6036 Eu
合約: 3 賽季 年齡: 23 歲
RT: 188 身高: 206 公分
潛力: 9
flag Chuan Si
薪資: -
合約: 學校潛力新秀 年齡: 17 歲
RT: 107 身高: 190 公分
潛力: 7
flag Sun Hang Yung
薪資: -
合約: 學校潛力新秀 年齡: 16 歲
RT: 93 身高: 204 公分
潛力: 7
flag Albericht Muresan
薪資: 9326 Eu
合約: 4 賽季 年齡: 18 歲
RT: 144 身高: 186 公分
潛力: 10
Icon 交易/租借球員: KK caplje & Grizzlies
-- 94 賽季 9 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 5
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易,但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。 -- 94 賽季 19 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 1<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 賽季 19 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Hi, i dont really know why the trade was bot aproved, ne and the manager of KK caplje discussed a lot of days how we could make the deal happen. We also had to divide in 2 separate trades because there were many players involved in the trade. There are a lot of benefits for BOTH of us to make this deal happen. Me geting a few young players (and a lot weaker than what i gave) to help me reach WL4 in the near future and for my trade partner to reduce his salary, reduce maintenence of the school and geting a WL1 player in return, also the players he used in this trade werent strong enough for his team anyway. Why is this wrong? Without no explanation the trade didnt passed. Can someone be kind and give me 1 explanation? Thank you :) -- 94 賽季 20 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0