Trade information

Accepted

Information
Start of negotiation	2021-05-05- 19:32
End of negotiation	2021-05-05- 19:33
Restrictions' level	9

GREEK FREAK

	Eugenijus Kalvelis
	Salary:	16901 Eu
	Contract:	4 S	Age:	21 y.
	RT:	198	Height:	207 cm.
	Potential:	10
	Nathan Steradian
	Salary:	5957 Eu
	Contract:	2 S	Age:	19 y.
	RT:	164	Height:	174 cm.
	Potential:	8
	Hendrik Dreyfuss
	Salary:	8985 Eu
	Contract:	5 S	Age:	17 y.
	RT:	108	Height:	207 cm.
	Potential:	8

Pliusinė Sesija

	Miguel Jiménez
	Salary:	25240 Eu
	Contract:	1 S	Age:	32 y.
	RT:	330	Height:	203 cm.
	Potential:	9
	Jaunutis Bagatskas
	Salary:	27533 Eu
	Contract:	2 S	Age:	30 y.
	RT:	313	Height:	210 cm.
	Potential:	6
	Polis Katelynas
	Salary:	-
	Contract:	School talent	Age:	15 y.
	RT:	49	Height:	199 cm.
	Potential:	8

1.1 2.1 GREEKFREAK

Trade/Lending players: GREEKFREAK & Pliusinė

-- 81 S 24 d.

Team made a trade offer

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Player:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Player:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Player:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Player:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Player:

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Player: Polis Katelynas

Started to play in a new team after a trade -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Trade offer accepted -- 81 S 24 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

1.1 2.1 longxia

jajajajaja -- 81 S 25 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+3

ゞ☆火麒麟☆ゞ

GOOD -- 81 S 25 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

*GOD -- 81 S 25 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

CO -- 81 S 25 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Fair play committee

This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 81 S 26 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Fair play committee

How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
<br />
-- 81 S 26 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

1.1 1.1 事出无常必有妖

Fair？ Fair！哈哈哈哈哈 -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

2.2 4.4 Frankebasta

hahaha -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

lol -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

How is this possible it is accepted??? -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

1.1 3.2 andronikos

One team take exp and the other young players. Where is the strange?? -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

So why can’t I do this kind of trade???? Why is there some teams able to make whatever they like, some teams (nearly everyone) can’t???? -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+2

1.1 2.1 dmalios

You can see that the other team has 9 trade level -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Investment changes game’s rule for different owner.
This is new and stupid. -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

1.1 3.2 andronikos

this with 8 and 9 in transfers is very old !!! I do not even know how anyone could get it. -- 81 S 27 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

ゞ☆火麒麟☆ゞ

果然还是有钱人的天下 -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

2.2 3.2 joancrumor

Good morning, this game works like this, the users who invested and have a high level of trade have a great advantage over the other users and have used that advantage for this trade and nothing can be done. What seems strange is that out of 12 members of the committee only 6 vote and then there are no justified reasons from the users of the trade, there should be a minimum of positive votes, for example 9 for the trade to be considered correct. Everything seems very strange and dark, something fails that little by little destroys the game, every day we see strange situations between users in a closed circle between them, always the same trade, in helps, etc, this is bad for the game to grow, which is what the owners of the game remind me every season. Every day it becomes more difficult to play this game, I am getting tired of fighting against the current, is my modest opinion. -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+5

1.1 1.1 Zolininkas

kaifuoju matydamas stumimus -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

Pasirodo, kad stumt irgi reikia sugebėt. Nes kol kas, kaip sako klasikai, čia yra perdimas į vandenį. -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Oho laikai atejo, CO cituojamas tikrojo Dievo -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

Is this the privilege of the Lithuanian community？ -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

It makes me sick how hypocrite some of you are. Number of you made the same 9 level trades and avoided restrictions, but are very quick to forget about that.
@GOD and

fourkings how these trades avoided RT restrictions? -

https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/960470 or

https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Trade/information/999085 -- 81 S 28 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+9

我好奇的是，为什么类似的交易，有些就是好的交易，有些却被认定为违规，这非常有趣，这游戏是一个拼人缘的游戏，你只要人缘好，你可以为所欲为！这绝对不是拼战术拼动作的篮球经理游戏！ -- 81 S 30 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

1.1 2.1 longxia

https://www.basketpulse.com/cn/Trade/information/1036621
同样的交易，比这笔全票通过的交易还公平，结果委员会投票是9票不公平，这就是你们委员会口中所说的公平，简直是一群小丑 -- 81 S 30 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0

Show hidden replies: 31

Longxia: reverted trade you mention was not reverted because it was seen as unbalancd. Look at the reasoning.

feishe: please explain why this particular trade is unfair. have you looked at the players? The "shiny" 10pot is scouted at 20yo. Those are hard to ever use in wl1 due to bad training and low xp. That makes the rest of the trade much more understandable ...

Full disclosure: I didn't vote, only 6 voted (maybe too fast, but the system is constructed this way), so not a unanimous decision per se. FPC lets vast majority of trades pass of every community even if we would not make it except if they are strongly disbalanced or we strongly suspect cheating/helping patterns. Both was not the case here. -- 81 S 30 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+2

longxia don't be a troll or you are? -- 81 S 30 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+1

ゞ☆火麒麟☆ゞ

This is called the manager level gap. Who calls them level 10 managers -- 81 S 37 d.

-- (Translate) (Translate EN)

+0