Trade information
Reverted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2021-01-02- 11:20 |
| End of negotiation | 2021-01-02- 16:13 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Aurėlijus Lilenas | |||
| Salary: | 13047 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 24 y. | |
| RT: | 256 | Height: | 203 cm. | |
| Potential: | 9 | |||
|
Kemen Herencia
|
|||
| Salary: | 11589 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 26 y. | |
| RT: | 239 | Height: | 196 cm. | |
| Potential: | 6 | |||
5.13
Trade/Lending players:
+0
Show hidden replies: 4
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that this trade is unfair and both teams were punished.
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 S 27 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 S 27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
