Informação da troca
Revertido
Informação | |
---|---|
Começo da negociação | 2021-01-02- 11:20 |
Fim da negociação | 2021-01-02- 16:13 |
Nível de restrições |
![]() |
Aurėlijus Lilenas | |||
Salário: | 13047 Eu | |||
Contrato: | 1 T | Idade: | 24 a. | |
HT: | 256 | Altura: | 203 cm | |
Potencial: | 9 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Salário: | 11589 Eu | |||
Contrato: | 4 T | Idade: | 26 a. | |
HT: | 239 | Altura: | 196 cm | |
Potencial: | 6 |

+0
Mostrar respostas ocultas: 4


A troca foi revertida pelo comitê de "Fair play"
--
79 T
27 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


O comitê de Fair play decidiu que essa troca é injusta e ambas as equipes foram punidas.
--
79 T
27 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 T 27 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 T 27 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0