Press conference
5.13
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade participant's message sitie mainai yra saziningi, prasome pries priimdami savo sprendimus atkreipti demesi i komandu situacijas ir financines galimybes, man reikia izaidejo, o rinkoje nera labai daug man tinkamu zaideju, todel pasirinkau SG su geru izaidinejimu(jei netingetumet pasiziuretumet kad neturiu izaidejo). pratest su savo zaideju labai noreciau kontrakta, bet financine bukle man neleidzia to padaryti(nzn ar jus matot mano financus, bet jie yra ganetinai sudini. aciu uz supratinguma
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
2.1
Trade has been reverted by the "Fair play" committee
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
The Fair play committee decided that this trade is unfair and both teams were punished.
--
79 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 S 27 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 S 27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0