Club's information

Team's logo

flag Cibuliai(Closed)

Team's logo team-jerseys-front team-jerseys-back
Local name: Cibuliai(Closed)
Manager: a-ramune
Life is beautiful logo
team-jerseys-back
points-leader

R. Liūtas

Matches: 588

Ranking: 11,7

Assists: 6,2

points-leader

G. Valaitis

Matches: 506

Ranking: 11,5

Points: 13,4

Three pointers: 50%

Two pointers: 65%

points-leader

E. Stankas

Matches: 435

Three pointers: 42%

Two pointers: 64%

Information

Club is not managed
Period of activity 2007-11-01 - 2015-04-25
Country flag Lithuania
Current club The Onions

Statistics

Overall wins/matches played 61/139 44%
Kėdainiai Icon Unknown player -- 05-31
Player changed team during limited market -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
me gustaria me cedieras -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Cibuliai(C -- 06-01
The club was closed -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Important information about progress in the new training and potentials' system! -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+9
Show hidden replies: 21
a-darius -- 05-28
TheWizardKs: It was not an "opinion" it was a fact. Scouting use the same algorithm for players and coaches.

P.S. Actually you can`t get anything from that statistics:
1) it is TOP20 list. So we have TOP20 players and ALL coaches (because not many peaple look for coaches)
2) People use different scouts' financing. It has considerable influence on chances to find good talent and statistics of found talents.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
TheCoach -- 05-28
Right, percentages there won't matter and not something you would use to drive home a point. All I does is say players invest more in players than coaches therefore you will find more players with higher potentials exactly what a-Darius said. Think of it on a smaller scale and it makes sense. I don't know what the ratio is of choosing a player vs a coach, but I imagine it is very high. (Higher than. 10-1). For an example lets just use 10-1. If 20 coaches are chosen that would mean you would have 200 players, for every good coach you would have 10 good players. The ratio of top player/coaches then would obviously have more good players than coaches not because of the system, but because of the practices of the managers. It all makes sense, teams usually have 1-3 managers and 9-12 players (more or less). To be honest, when you look at laches on the market , it has been easier for me to sign a good one there than it is to sign a good player.. -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
TheWizardKs -- 05-28
I see your point, just makes it obvious the whole scout thing needs some help, which I know I read that will soon happen. I've seen no mention of coaches so I hope they will continue to change with player changes. Coaches have gone up salary wise just as much as players. Thanks for the answers. -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Cibuliai(C -- 04-25
Manager left this club -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+2
Show hidden replies: 12
Captain left the ship? -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
longxia -- 04-25
╮(╯_╰)╭ -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
-- 04-25
About missed things...you all missed to read darius post!!!!!!!!!!!!! -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
Cibuliai(C -- 04-25
Club's fans cancelled the fan club -- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0