球員資訊
This page contains information about the virtual game's character. Any coincidences with the real people (name, surname or other information) are accidental and unintended.
x3
x1
x2
x1
Yannick Renoir
- 狀態:
- 筋疲力盡
- 年齡:
- 27 歲
- 身高:
- 206 公分 (6' 9'' )
- 位置:
- PF (SF)
- 能力值 (RT):
- 254
- 預估巔峰RT:
- 281
- 潛力:
- 9
技能
健康
運動技能:
投籃:
防守:
進攻:
合約資訊
期限 | 4 賽季 |
薪資 | 13 442 Eu |
意見 | 優秀 |
市場資訊
最低薪資要求 | 11 868 Eu |
選秀資訊
聯賽 | World League.3.2 |
賽季 | 89 |
球隊 | KK caplje megateam |
順位 | #17 |
+0
+0
+0
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 4
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
94 賽季
21 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平,並向球隊提出警告。
--
94 賽季
21 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 賽季 21 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 賽季 21 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 5
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易,但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
94 賽季
19 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 賽季 19 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 賽季 19 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
Hi, i dont really know why the trade was bot aproved, ne and the manager of KK caplje discussed a lot of days how we could make the deal happen. We also had to divide in 2 separate trades because there were many players involved in the trade. There are a lot of benefits for BOTH of us to make this deal happen. Me geting a few young players (and a lot weaker than what i gave) to help me reach WL4 in the near future and for my trade partner to reduce his salary, reduce maintenence of the school and geting a WL1 player in return, also the players he used in this trade werent strong enough for his team anyway. Why is this wrong? Without no explanation the trade didnt passed. Can someone be kind and give me 1 explanation? Thank you :)
--
94 賽季
20 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0