Informação da troca
Revertido
Informação | |
---|---|
Começo da negociação | 2022-09-08- 18:29 |
Fim da negociação | 2022-09-10- 20:44 |
Nível de restrições |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Salário: | 18926 Eu | |||
Contrato: | 5 T | Idade: | 24 a. | |
HT: | 259 | Altura: | 213 cm | |
Potencial: | 3 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Salário: | 17375 Eu | |||
Contrato: | 1 T | Idade: | 24 a. | |
HT: | 272 | Altura: | 206 cm | |
Potencial: | 10 |

+0
Mostrar respostas ocultas: 20


What logic is behind this "He didn't need them 4 seasons ago so he doesn't need them now" Well I didn't need a PG 4 seasons ago but now I do. What happens now, I'm banned from getting a PG because I had one 4 seasons ago?
--
89 T
19 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+1

What I'm trying to tell you is that the argument about local players is applicable when it's convenient. Just like in this unfair exchange.
--
89 T
19 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+1


Hello darys, I am confused about your argument. Of course team priorities can change, and local players are naturally no exception. I likely won't be able to keep the 10 pot player next season. I am being forced to lose the 10 potential player, rather than exchange it for a useful high RT player that will stay cheaper for longer, that is also a Turkish national.
--
89 T
19 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+7