Trade information
Reverted
Information | |
---|---|
Start forhandling | 2022-09-08- 18:29 |
Slut handlen | 2022-09-10- 20:44 |
Restrictions' level |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Løn: | 18926 Eu | |||
Kontrakt: | 5 S | Alder: | 24 y. | |
RT: | 259 | Højte: | 213 cm. | |
Potentiale: | 3 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Løn: | 17375 Eu | |||
Kontrakt: | 1 S | Alder: | 24 y. | |
RT: | 272 | Højte: | 206 cm. | |
Potentiale: | 10 |

+0
Vis skjulte svar: 20


What logic is behind this "He didn't need them 4 seasons ago so he doesn't need them now" Well I didn't need a PG 4 seasons ago but now I do. What happens now, I'm banned from getting a PG because I had one 4 seasons ago?
--
89 S
19 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+1

What I'm trying to tell you is that the argument about local players is applicable when it's convenient. Just like in this unfair exchange.
--
89 S
19 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+1


Hello darys, I am confused about your argument. Of course team priorities can change, and local players are naturally no exception. I likely won't be able to keep the 10 pot player next season. I am being forced to lose the 10 potential player, rather than exchange it for a useful high RT player that will stay cheaper for longer, that is also a Turkish national.
--
89 S
19 Dag
--
(Oversæt)
(Oversæt EN)
+7