Takas bilgisi
Geri alındı
Bilgi | |
---|---|
Müzakere başlangıcı | 2022-09-08- 18:29 |
Müzakere sonu | 2022-09-10- 20:44 |
Restrictions' level |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Maaş: | 18926 Eu | |||
Sözleşme: | 5 S | Yaş: | 24 y. | |
GS: | 259 | Boy: | 213 cm. | |
Potansiyel: | 3 |
![]() |
![]() |
|||
Maaş: | 17375 Eu | |||
Sözleşme: | 1 S | Yaş: | 24 y. | |
GS: | 272 | Boy: | 206 cm. | |
Potansiyel: | 10 |

+0
Gizli cevapları göster: 20


What logic is behind this "He didn't need them 4 seasons ago so he doesn't need them now" Well I didn't need a PG 4 seasons ago but now I do. What happens now, I'm banned from getting a PG because I had one 4 seasons ago?
--
89 S
19 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+1

What I'm trying to tell you is that the argument about local players is applicable when it's convenient. Just like in this unfair exchange.
--
89 S
19 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+1


Hello darys, I am confused about your argument. Of course team priorities can change, and local players are naturally no exception. I likely won't be able to keep the 10 pot player next season. I am being forced to lose the 10 potential player, rather than exchange it for a useful high RT player that will stay cheaper for longer, that is also a Turkish national.
--
89 S
19 g.
--
(tercüme et)
(tercüme et EN)
+7