conferência de imprensa

Equipe fez uma oferta de troca
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


Começou a jogar em um novo time após uma troca
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


Começou a jogar em um novo time após uma troca
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


Começou a jogar em um novo time após uma troca
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


Começou a jogar em um novo time após uma troca
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


Oferta de troca aceita
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


A troca foi revertida pelo comitê de "Fair play"
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0

the trade had been reverted,but why the players are not reverted?
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+5


Esta troca não foi revertida porque é tarde demais para isso
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


O comitê de Fair play decidiu que a troca é injusta e as equipes recebem um aviso.
--
75 T
1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- One-sided trade when a 15y/o 10pot school talent is traded for lower ceiling and potential players.<br />
-- 75 T 1 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- One-sided trade when a 15y/o 10pot school talent is traded for lower ceiling and potential players.<br />
-- 75 T 1 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0

unacceptable reason, "to late" is simply FCP incapability
--
75 T
4 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+0


Shouldn't you be already gone?
--
75 T
4 d.
--
(Traduzir)
(Traduzir EN)
+8