Spaudos konferencija
1.1
Mainai/Žaidėjų skolinimas:
Komanda pateikė mainų pasiūlymą
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Dėl įvykusių mainų pradėjo žaisti naujoje komandoje
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Mainų pasiūlymas priimtas
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
"Sąžiningo žaidimo" komiteto sprendimu mainai buvo anuliuoti
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
1.1
the trade had been reverted,but why the players are not reverted?
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+5
Šie mainai nebuvo atstatyti (anuliuoti), nes jau per vėlu tai atlikti
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Sąžiningo žaidimo komitetas nusprendė, kad šie mainai yra nesąžiningi ir komandos yra įspėjamos.
--
75 sez.
1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- One-sided trade when a 15y/o 10pot school talent is traded for lower ceiling and potential players.<br />
-- 75 sez. 1 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- One-sided trade when a 15y/o 10pot school talent is traded for lower ceiling and potential players.<br />
-- 75 sez. 1 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
1.1
unacceptable reason, "to late" is simply FCP incapability
--
75 sez.
4 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Shouldn't you be already gone?
--
75 sez.
4 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+8
