Žaidėjo informacija
Šiame puslapyje yra pateikta virtualaus žaidimo personažo informacija. Bet kokie sutapimai su realiais asmenimis (vardas, pavardė ir kiti duomenys) yra atsitiktiniai.
x3
x1
x2
x1
Yannick Renoir
- Forma:
- Visiškai išsekęs
- Amžius:
- 27 m.
- Ūgis:
- 206 cm. (6' 9'' )
- Pozicija:
- PF (SF)
- Vertės koeficientas (VK):
- 253
- Numatomas piko VK:
- 283
- Potencialas:
- 9
Įgūdžiai
Sveikata
Atletiškumas:
Taiklumas:
Gynyba:
Puolimas:
Sutarties informacija
| Terminas | 4 sez. |
| Alga | 13 442 Eu |
| Nuomonė | Puikus |
Rinkos informacija
| Minimali pageidaujama alga | 11 648 Eu |
Draftų informacija
| Lyga |
World League.3.2
|
| Sezonas | 89 |
| Komanda | KK caplje megateam |
| Šaukimo nr. | #17 |
1.1
Žaidėjas:
+0
+0
Mainai/Žaidėjų skolinimas:
+0
1.1
1.1
+0
Rodyti paslėptus atsakymus: 4
"Sąžiningo žaidimo" komiteto sprendimu mainai buvo anuliuoti
--
94 sez.
21 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Sąžiningo žaidimo komitetas nusprendė, kad šie mainai yra nesąžiningi ir komandos yra įspėjamos.
--
94 sez.
21 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 sez. 21 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 sez. 21 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
+0
Rodyti paslėptus atsakymus: 5
Buvo pranešta, kad šie mainai gali būti nesąžiningi. Visgi Sąžiningo žaidimo komitetas nusprendė, kad šie mainai sąžiningi.
--
94 sez.
19 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 sez. 19 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 sez. 19 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
Hi, i dont really know why the trade was bot aproved, ne and the manager of KK caplje discussed a lot of days how we could make the deal happen. We also had to divide in 2 separate trades because there were many players involved in the trade. There are a lot of benefits for BOTH of us to make this deal happen. Me geting a few young players (and a lot weaker than what i gave) to help me reach WL4 in the near future and for my trade partner to reduce his salary, reduce maintenence of the school and geting a WL1 player in return, also the players he used in this trade werent strong enough for his team anyway. Why is this wrong? Without no explanation the trade didnt passed. Can someone be kind and give me 1 explanation? Thank you :)
--
94 sez.
20 d.
--
(Versti)
(Versti EN)
+0
- Forma: Nepasirengęs
- Forma: Beveik nepasirengęs
- Forma: Puiki
- Forma: Pavargęs
- Forma: Visiškai išsekęs
- Negali būti registruojamas rungtynėms
- Vardinis žaidėjas
- Komandos kapitonas
- Mokyklos talentas
- Žaidėjas baigęs karjerą
- Klubas nori išmainyti šį žaidėją
- Klubas nenori išmainyti šio žaidėjo
- Žaidėjo perkėlimas į kitas komandas šiuo metu negalimas
- Žaidėjas paskolintas (turi kontraktą su kitu klubu)
- Sezono pabaigoje ketina baigti karjerą
- Puikiai deda į krepšį
- Puikiai ginasi
- Puikiai pataiko tritaškius metimus
- Puikiai įžaidinėja kamuolį
- Aukso medalis
- Sidabro medalis
- Bronzos medalis
- Sezono MVP
- Sezono TOP5
- Perspektyviausias lygoje
- Žvaigždžių dienos dalyvis