Trade information
Accepted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2020-04-22- 15:42 |
| End of negotiation | 2020-04-22- 16:14 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Ofa Otake | |||
| Salary: | 2924 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 22 y. | |
| RT: | 139 | Height: | 206 cm. | |
| Potential: | 6 | |||
|
|
Madhav Basnyat | |||
| Salary: | 2078 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 21 y. | |
| RT: | 106 | Height: | 210 cm. | |
| Potential: | 5 | |||
|
|
Ernest Torroella
|
|||
| Salary: | 431 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 18 y. | |
| RT: | 101 | Height: | 217 cm. | |
| Potential: | 5 | |||
|
|
Antoni Font | |||
| Salary: | 477 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 4 S | Age: | 18 y. | |
| RT: | 96 | Height: | 216 cm. | |
| Potential: | 5 | |||
|
|
Leho Sarapuu | |||
| Salary: | 6380 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 19 y. | |
| RT: | 127 | Height: | 196 cm. | |
| Potential: | 8 | |||
Trade/Lending players:
+0
2.2
Show hidden replies: 11
my Italian friend, You get this wrong - its not even that bad, its worse.
The 2 6-pot players actually are significantly overpayed (especially, for lower WL team) marking them both as liabilities. With regards to those 5-pots - well, 0 value there, right?
9 fair votes - jokes. The guys that makes these calls have power and apparent "expertise" to value such situations, they are being rewarded on weekly basis for this, yet, they have literally 0 responsibility whatsoever for the calls they make. One can interpret this as covering someone's interests here, and as Committee is so fed up with punishing someone - You have there a legitimate list of 9 users who either are too ignorant, unexperienced, or simply don't give a fck about the duties they are being rewarded for.
Go figure which is the real party that should be punished here - young LTU team, experienced LTU team trying to exploit inexperience of a trade partner or apparently useless Committee which should monitor these types of situations. -- 75 S 27 d.
The 2 6-pot players actually are significantly overpayed (especially, for lower WL team) marking them both as liabilities. With regards to those 5-pots - well, 0 value there, right?
9 fair votes - jokes. The guys that makes these calls have power and apparent "expertise" to value such situations, they are being rewarded on weekly basis for this, yet, they have literally 0 responsibility whatsoever for the calls they make. One can interpret this as covering someone's interests here, and as Committee is so fed up with punishing someone - You have there a legitimate list of 9 users who either are too ignorant, unexperienced, or simply don't give a fck about the duties they are being rewarded for.
Go figure which is the real party that should be punished here - young LTU team, experienced LTU team trying to exploit inexperience of a trade partner or apparently useless Committee which should monitor these types of situations. -- 75 S 27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+11
1.1
Totally agree with Treideris, we need to know who votes for what ,the member that votes the other reason gets my respect
--
75 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+7
Yes, this trade is the great example of a fair trade! But this one is clearly unfair and teams might be cheating - 
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Press-read-12988458.htm
#consistency -- 75 S 29 d.
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Press-read-12988458.htm#consistency -- 75 S 29 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
