Press conference
Trade/Lending players:
Team made a trade offer
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade participant's message Jei sudomintų. Pm. Neblogai treniruoti žaidėjai.
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Started to play in a new team after a trade
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
Trade offer accepted
--
75 S
24 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair.
--
75 S
26 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- giving up multiple low potential players does not make trade equal <br />
-- 75 S 26 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 9<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- giving up multiple low potential players does not make trade equal <br />
-- 75 S 26 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
9 fair votes for this one? - as blind as it gets. Committee at its finest. (y)
--
75 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+6
2.2
what a joke!
4 players you can sign any day of the week at minimum salary for a pot8, and it is not a unbalanced trade? -- 75 S 27 d.
4 players you can sign any day of the week at minimum salary for a pot8, and it is not a unbalanced trade? -- 75 S 27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+10
my Italian friend, You get this wrong - its not even that bad, its worse.
The 2 6-pot players actually are significantly overpayed (especially, for lower WL team) marking them both as liabilities. With regards to those 5-pots - well, 0 value there, right?
9 fair votes - jokes. The guys that makes these calls have power and apparent "expertise" to value such situations, they are being rewarded on weekly basis for this, yet, they have literally 0 responsibility whatsoever for the calls they make. One can interpret this as covering someone's interests here, and as Committee is so fed up with punishing someone - You have there a legitimate list of 9 users who either are too ignorant, unexperienced, or simply don't give a fck about the duties they are being rewarded for.
Go figure which is the real party that should be punished here - young LTU team, experienced LTU team trying to exploit inexperience of a trade partner or apparently useless Committee which should monitor these types of situations. -- 75 S 27 d.
The 2 6-pot players actually are significantly overpayed (especially, for lower WL team) marking them both as liabilities. With regards to those 5-pots - well, 0 value there, right?
9 fair votes - jokes. The guys that makes these calls have power and apparent "expertise" to value such situations, they are being rewarded on weekly basis for this, yet, they have literally 0 responsibility whatsoever for the calls they make. One can interpret this as covering someone's interests here, and as Committee is so fed up with punishing someone - You have there a legitimate list of 9 users who either are too ignorant, unexperienced, or simply don't give a fck about the duties they are being rewarded for.
Go figure which is the real party that should be punished here - young LTU team, experienced LTU team trying to exploit inexperience of a trade partner or apparently useless Committee which should monitor these types of situations. -- 75 S 27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+11
1.1
Totally agree with Treideris, we need to know who votes for what ,the member that votes the other reason gets my respect
--
75 S
27 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+7
Yes, this trade is the great example of a fair trade! But this one is clearly unfair and teams might be cheating - 
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Press-read-12988458.htm
#consistency -- 75 S 29 d.
https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Press-read-12988458.htm#consistency -- 75 S 29 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1