Trade information
Reverted
| Information | |
|---|---|
| Start of negotiation | 2018-11-14- 07:32 |
| End of negotiation | 2018-11-14- 17:00 |
| Restrictions' level | |
|
Ruo Cuan | |||
| Salary: | 2000 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 2 S | Age: | 20 y. | |
| RT: | 114 | Height: | 198 cm. | |
| Potential: | 7 | |||
|
|
Tony Petersson | |||
| Salary: | 2000 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 2 S | Age: | 19 y. | |
| RT: | 97 | Height: | 188 cm. | |
| Potential: | 7 | |||
|
|
Leroy McIntyre | |||
| Salary: | 367 Eu | |||
| Contract: | 1 S | Age: | 21 y. | |
| RT: | 116 | Height: | 206 cm. | |
| Potential: | 3 | |||
Trade/Lending players:
+0
Show hidden replies: 5
I want to know why this transaction was withdrawn, so that I can avoid the same mistake again. Fair play can tell me why?
--
67 S
22 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
My team has reduced expenses, got better finances, and the other team has got some better players, which is good for both sides, isn't it?
--
67 S
22 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+1
Salary dumping is not a strategy that will be allowed by the FTC in fact new restrictions prevent it. Allowing trades just for the sake of reducing salaries would open the door to too many opportunities of cheating or making favorable deals once top 16 slash bottom 16. Zhuce try looking at the bigger picture and think what could happen to the game if salary dump trades were allowed. It really could cause chaos and no way anyone could manage that potential chaos.
--
67 S
22 d.
--
(Translate)
(Translate EN)
+0
