交易資訊
退回
| 資訊 | |
|---|---|
| 協商開始 | 2018-11-14- 07:32 |
| 協商結束 | 2018-11-14- 17:00 |
| 限制等級 | |
|
Ruo Cuan | |||
| 薪資: | 2000 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 2 賽季 | 年齡: | 20 歲 | |
| RT: | 114 | 身高: | 198 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 7 | |||
|
|
Tony Petersson | |||
| 薪資: | 2000 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 2 賽季 | 年齡: | 19 歲 | |
| RT: | 97 | 身高: | 188 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 7 | |||
|
|
Leroy McIntyre | |||
| 薪資: | 367 Eu | |||
| 合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 21 歲 | |
| RT: | 116 | 身高: | 206 公分 | |
| 潛力: | 3 | |||
交易/租借球員:
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 5
I want to know why this transaction was withdrawn, so that I can avoid the same mistake again. Fair play can tell me why?
--
67 賽季
22 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
My team has reduced expenses, got better finances, and the other team has got some better players, which is good for both sides, isn't it?
--
67 賽季
22 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
Salary dumping is not a strategy that will be allowed by the FTC in fact new restrictions prevent it. Allowing trades just for the sake of reducing salaries would open the door to too many opportunities of cheating or making favorable deals once top 16 slash bottom 16. Zhuce try looking at the bigger picture and think what could happen to the game if salary dump trades were allowed. It really could cause chaos and no way anyone could manage that potential chaos.
--
67 賽季
22 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
