Sidiav --> 8. It is forbidden to artificially bring press conferences to the top on the same day. Next day, if the post is still relevant, it can be brought to the top by commenting on it.
9. It is forbidden to repeat the same information in press conferences on the same day.
--
104 S
44 d.
According to rule 1.17. Today;
In game 2 of the top 8 series against my opponent BC Inquisitors in WL.4.2, my opponent intentionally came out to lose this game so that he could play at home in game 3 and earn more money. I see this as unethical, cynical and unsportsmanlike behavior.
I will be watching and waiting to see what punishments will be given to the opposing team as soon as possible.
--
104 S
44 d.
DostVeViski FPC does not do anything on their own initiative. They only respond to reports. Report a user for unfair behavior and then FPC will investigate the situation. You will never know what punishment was or was not given to another user. If you want to know, you can try asking your federation's FPC member, but as far as I know, FPC members are not allowed to spread internal information either.
--
104 S
44 d.
Last few seasons you already had to select words what you write in press conferences very carefully. There is no freedom of speech already left here, so I suggest to remove press conferences completely or make it paid function. Its not used much, for example, from thousands of games generated already this season throughout all the leagues, only 21 total was commented. For trades you can just mark a players you want to trade. A bunch of current press conferences is hidden anyway, so that would save some time and maybe more time would be left for updates.
--
104 S
44 d.
I have a question about this part: "Public announcements or discussions about received sanctions are strictly prohibited." I understand that this means I’m not allowed to speak about sanctions I’ve personally received.Yet, am I also prohibited from discussing sanctions received by others, if I know they’ve been sanctioned?
My main question is about the reasoning behind this rule. What problem is it intended to solve? Is it designed to protect the FPC from external pressure, or is there another purpose? I’m asking because I’m struggling to understand how a lack of openness and transparency is supposed to build confidence in the FPC. This approach seems to run counter to common best practices among respected companies and institutions, where transparency is often emphasized as a foundation for maintaining trust.
Thanks!
--
104 S
44 d.
You are very welcome to discuss, how trades should be judged (in the future). You can find some examples and offer some generalizations (guidelines) for judging trades in the future. Such discussions could take place in your community and if community agrees on some offers - pass the offers to FPC by your community's FPC member (or another FPC member if community doesn't have one).
Public announcements or discussions about ALREADY received sanctions are strictly prohibited.
Here are guidelines what can be done in case of received sanctions (from the Rules of Trades):
"
6. The applied punishments are final and non-negotiable. Public discussions about sanctions are strictly prohibited.
If a user has questions, he may politely contact one of the FPC (Fair Play Committee) members for clarification.
If you believe FPC should handle something differently, discuss it within your community and ask your FPC members to raise the issue within the FPC.
If you believe contacting the FPC is not enough and the administration should be informed, please use the “Message to Administration” section. Do not forget to include as many details as possible. The administration does not override FPC decisions; however, if there was indeed a mistake or there is a better way to handle the situation, we will try to reach out to the FPC to improve how similar cases are handled in the future.
"
--
104 S
45 d.
Thank you for your response. However, the main purpose behind this rule still remains unclear for me. What exactly are you trying to achieve with it?
--
104 S
45 d.
Good afternoon. There were 13 players on the team. 1 retired and I couldn’t remove him from the roster. As a result, they removed a player that I really needed for the game.
Although the one who retired was not on the roster? What should I do?
We are finally starting national league semis vs ambitious Fishnchips team. Soon we will find out how tough of the team they are. Our fan club has a hope that we beat them by Friday, as Mk Warriors management promised them free fish n chips if MkW go 2-0!
4.4
1.1
DostVeViski
3.3
Match: 
1.1
Player: 
1.1
1.1
2.1