記者會
5.13
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易參與者的訊息 sitie mainai yra saziningi, prasome pries priimdami savo sprendimus atkreipti demesi i komandu situacijas ir financines galimybes, man reikia izaidejo, o rinkoje nera labai daug man tinkamu zaideju, todel pasirinkau SG su geru izaidinejimu(jei netingetumet pasiziuretumet kad neturiu izaidejo). pratest su savo zaideju labai noreciau kontrakta, bet financine bukle man neleidzia to padaryti(nzn ar jus matot mano financus, bet jie yra ganetinai sudini. aciu uz supratinguma
--
79 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
79 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
79 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
2.1
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
79 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，兩支球隊均予以處罰。
--
79 賽季
27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 賽季 27 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 賽季 27 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0