交易資訊

接受

資訊
協商開始 2020-02-22- 21:02
協商結束 2020-02-22- 21:34
限制等級 7
Ülkü Çetinok
薪資: 4269 Eu
合約: 4 賽季 年齡: 24 歲
RT: 202 身高: 176 公分
潛力: 7
Danys Baigvila
薪資: 2351 Eu
合約: 4 賽季 年齡: 25 歲
RT: 174 身高: 198 公分
潛力: 7
Ilija Claric
薪資: -
合約: 學校潛力新秀 年齡: 15 歲
RT: 57 身高: 175 公分
潛力: 8
Leandro Leguizamón
薪資: 4666 Eu
合約: 2 賽季 年齡: 26 歲
RT: 226 身高: 193 公分
潛力: 3
Icon 交易/租借球員: NightOwl & Timberwolv
-- 74 賽季 27 天
球隊提出交易請求
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 6
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平,並向球隊提出警告。 -- 75 賽季 16 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 75 賽季 16 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+0
Hello, colleagues.
Probably, it is a kind of misunderstanding.
Yes I have traded a stronger and cheaper player. But first of all, the Trade was proposed from other side. I'v just accept it, when analyzed. I have enough budget (on the day of the Trade), so the money was not the issue for me. This Argentinian player was not important for me, because I had a several national players on that position. I usually tried to play with national belarussian players.
And the last, but the most important - now I'm searching for very youg talented palyers. And the major point of this Trade for me - was 15-y.o. Croatian player (Claric), which I needed.
So I ensure all of us - there is no any intention even to think about unfair moves.
Thanks for understanding.
-- 75 賽季 16 天
-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)
+1