交易信息

接受

信息
谈判起始 2020-02-22- 21:02
谈判结束 2020-02-22- 21:34
限制级别 7
Ülkü Çetinok
薪水: 4269 Eu
合同: 4 季 年龄: 24 岁
RT: 202 身高: 176 cm.
潜力: 7
Danys Baigvila
薪水: 2351 Eu
合同: 4 季 年龄: 25 岁
RT: 174 身高: 198 cm.
潜力: 7
Ilija Claric
薪水: -
合同: 学院球员 年龄: 15 岁
RT: 57 身高: 175 cm.
潜力: 8
Leandro Leguizamón
薪水: 4666 Eu
合同: 2 季 年龄: 26 岁
RT: 226 身高: 193 cm.
潜力: 3
Icon 交易/租借球员: NightOwl & Timberwolv
-- 74 季 27 天
球队提出了交易报价
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
显示隐藏的回复: 6
公平竞赛委员会决定交易不公平,并给予球队警告。 -- 75 季 16 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 6<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
3 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
-- 75 季 16 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+0
Hello, colleagues.
Probably, it is a kind of misunderstanding.
Yes I have traded a stronger and cheaper player. But first of all, the Trade was proposed from other side. I'v just accept it, when analyzed. I have enough budget (on the day of the Trade), so the money was not the issue for me. This Argentinian player was not important for me, because I had a several national players on that position. I usually tried to play with national belarussian players.
And the last, but the most important - now I'm searching for very youg talented palyers. And the major point of this Trade for me - was 15-y.o. Croatian player (Claric), which I needed.
So I ensure all of us - there is no any intention even to think about unfair moves.
Thanks for understanding.
-- 75 季 16 天
-- (翻译) (翻译 EN)
+1