交易資訊

This trade is totally balanced. I am trading Karpelis who is a beast PG and he has 15% health inner and 5% extra health trained + Aula who is gonna be top player in game with great inners. I am taking Morkus who has -34% health inner + Garklavs who also has negative health inner + Fadeev who is small and he also has negative health inner and a YT player who is not good. I wanted younger players in SF and PF position so that's the reason of the trade and he is getting future WL1 top PF/C. As I said this is totally balanced. Have a good day. -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 Zolininkas

bahurai varkes suka, verksniai ozina -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

A ver cuánto tarda la.primera denuncia..que la vea yo! -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Pues a los 10 segundos de aceptar el trade ya estaba denunciado xD -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.2 joancrumor

Es que tienes un club de fans impresionante ;P -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

公平競賽委員會

交易已被公平競賽委員會退回 -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

公平競賽委員會

公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。 -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

公平競賽委員會

How the Fair Play Committee members voted: 
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0 
- volunteers voted "Revert": 9 
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1 
 
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting: 
7 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams 
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user 
 
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: 
--- Suspicious that Duranciokas in press conference wrote about reducing salaries while in trade he's the one rasing salaries and giving up several young big mans for one overpaid and with ending contract. 
-- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

One reason to take Into account only. Funny... -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

No entiendo al FPC...un trade entre un primera y un segunda..y alguien da razón de Fake trade y otro algo por el estilo. ¿Quién vota estas cosas? -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Votes some idiots from wl4-5, that shouldnt be in the fpc -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Me parece una auténtica verguenza. ¿El FPC sirve realmente de algo? ¿A un día del cierre de mercado revertís un traspaso porqué Duranciokas dijo que quería ahorrar y en este traspaso no ahorra? ¿Qué argumento es ese? Él es libre de aceptar un trade suba o baje salarios, diga o no diga que quiere subir salarios. ¿Y si acepta el trade porqué quiere a Aula a toda costa? Entonces nos estáis perjudicando a ambos. ¿Y si éste traspaso lo hubieran llevado a cabo equipos como Naujas, Magnificent o Briedziai, se hubiera permitido? Una vez más se os ve de lejos... Gran parte de la comunidad está muy harta de vuestras decisiones, como también de que según que usuarios formen parte del FPC y que echéis a gente válida e imparcial como profesors (BC Saules iela) solo porqué la comunidad letona es pequeña. En fin, una vez más os habéis equivocado y una vez más esto quedará en nada. Buenas noches... -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Otra cosa mi jugador Aula estaba en mi equipo juvenil. Ahora tengo que pagar la tasa por bajarlo de nuevo con que vuestra decisión ocasiona perjuicios económicos (-38250€). Es una verguenza lo que está pasando -- 93 賽季 36 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

I have the impression that the FPC often causes more trouble than it helps the community.
Or is it just me? -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Y 1 a-darius

Administration and FPC have received information that one of the trade participants intends to leave the game and engage in any trades. If FPC suspects that a team may not have a "normally active manager," the trade should be reversed. -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Ok. I understand that under these circumstances.
Then I just hope that this information is also correct and not only scattered to manipulate the decision of the FPC.
That would be outrageous. -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

O iš kur čia tokia info? Ar tam kas nepatiko mainai ir „paožino“ skleidžia kažkokius gandus? Vadovautis kažkokiais gandais, žemas lygis... Iš vis fpc formatas nesąmonė, kodėl jame sėdi žaidimo dalyviai, kurie gali būti, kai kuriais atvejais šališki ir gali turėti asmeniškumų. Yra n pavyzdžių, kai fpc narių abejotini mainai praeina be problemų, bet nesivelsiu čia į beprasmę diskusiją, kuri niekur nenuves. -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Its easy solution. Trades between 1-3WL with no FPC, its suppose there experience mánagers. Unless are fake teams.
Trades with a team lower than WL3, should be check, to avoid cons and problems -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

ulipulido I also take a critical view of this.
Personally, I don't want a two-tier society.

What would happen if the information that led to the withdrawal of the two trades in question turned out to be untrue, or at least this one of the two participants did not leave the game after all? -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Yo no tengo ni idea de si Viesulas Rezus tiene intención de dejar el juego o no, a penas he cruzado mensajes con él durante mi estancia en el juego. ¿Y en caso de que él decidiera dejarlo, qué culpa tengo yo? El trade en sí está balanceado, por lo que no hay motivo objetivo para revertirlo. Otra cosa a tener muy en cuenta y espero una respuesta de Darius o del FPC es que cuando se revierte un trade involucrando un jugador del YT, no se debería volver a tener que pagar la tasa por transferencia al YT ya que éste jugador ya estaba antes en la plantilla del YT. La decisión del FPC no puede afectar la ecnomía de los equipos en éste sentido. Espero una respuesta sobre esto. -- 93 賽季 37 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Hmm. It doesn't seem to me that Rezus is planning to abandon the game.
He is active every day and extends his players.
Would someone who no longer plays the game or plans to quit do that? -- 93 賽季 44 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

mayybe he planning to delete in season 100 :D -- 93 賽季 44 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Viesulas Rezus did not quit yet.
Seems that the "information Administration and FPC have received that one of the trade participants intends to leave the game and engage in any trades" has not become true. -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

No words. -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.4 3.3 a-darius

Our information was 100% correct. Just because the user didn't leave the game doesn't mean our decision was wrong. In similar situations in the future, we will take the same approach as it was the right thing to do.
The community wanted FPC and the ability to reverse trades for such cases. -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Y 3 Mirza

Guys, let’s think a little bit more then one step ahead. It’s perfect way to compromise FPC - to not delete the team -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.1 timmy296701

Dont represent me, I am one of the community and I dont want FPC AT ALL. At least not this format. Thanks. -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 2.1 Zenetto

What happens if Rezus makes a trade now ? Is it still reverted bcs he plans to leave ? :) -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Up -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 Jautrais

darius, with all do respect, but - have You lost Your mind? - how can You state that "our information was 100% correct" if You made some dubious assumption about one of trade participants that never materialized? - as far as community is concerned, Your information was 0% correct and will remain so as long as Rezus is in the game.

But no worries - if I see my opponent in WL1 making any trade to become stronger, I will just report that with claims that other team is throwing -> based on Your approach, that will always be true.

What a circus this is. -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

it seems Rezus searching trades :D -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 klinci

It will be reported immediately :) -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

顯示隱藏回應: 39

3.4 3.3 a-darius

Common guys... With all due respect - just send a private message to him and ask him directly.
If he isn't a liar, he would confirm my statement.

As for his other trades, that's up to the FPC. But since he made trades with the clear intention of leaving the game, in my opinion, all his trades should be carefully reviewed. -- 94 賽季 8 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)