交易資訊
接受
資訊 | |
---|---|
協商開始 | 2023-01-26- 01:47 |
協商結束 | 2023-01-26- 19:01 |
限制等級 |
|
Jean Reaidy | |||
薪資: | 2734 Eu | |||
合約: | 1 賽季 | 年齡: | 20 歲 | |
RT: | 168 | 身高: | 221 公分 | |
潛力: | 6 |
|
Tarik Foucault | |||
薪資: | - | |||
合約: | 學校潛力新秀 | 年齡: | 16 歲 | |
RT: | 55 | 身高: | 201 公分 | |
潛力: | 3 |
+0
顯示隱藏回應: 34
oj patikek as ju neginu:D man tiesiog yra keista, kai tiek daug zmoniu uzkliuna tie mainai, kai jau tiek laiko praeje:D reikejo floodint is kart, gal butumet ka pakeite
--
91 賽季
62 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
I'm aware of the rule, I want to know why it exists. The player also isn't "free". His salary next season is 10k+. There's functionally no difference between them hiring a player from the market at this price vs getting him via trade right now. And they can afford it since they're paying almost 60k in salaries.
Granted, there's virtually no benefit for the other team, besides saving 2k this last week, so based on that I would be suspicious... but hypothetically if they were saving 10k on a continuing contract, I would call that a fair trade. One team gets a good talent for a league average price and the other team doesn't have to pay his salary. -- 91 賽季 63 天
Granted, there's virtually no benefit for the other team, besides saving 2k this last week, so based on that I would be suspicious... but hypothetically if they were saving 10k on a continuing contract, I would call that a fair trade. One team gets a good talent for a league average price and the other team doesn't have to pay his salary. -- 91 賽季 63 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0