Trade information

Accepted

Information
Start of negotiation 2023-01-26- 01:47
End of negotiation 2023-01-26- 19:01
Restrictions' level 10
flag Jean Reaidy Player is lent and will not be available in your team until the end of season
Salary: 2734 Eu
Contract: 1 S Age: 20 y.
RT: 168 Height: 221 cm.
Potential: 6
Tarik Foucault
Salary: -
Contract: School talent Age: 16 y.
RT: 55 Height: 201 cm.
Potential: 3
Icon Trade/Lending players: Wǒ bù pà & Lucky Rats
-- 91 S 25 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Show hidden replies: 34
oj patikek as ju neginu:D man tiesiog yra keista, kai tiek daug zmoniu uzkliuna tie mainai, kai jau tiek laiko praeje:D reikejo floodint is kart, gal butumet ka pakeite -- 91 S 62 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
I'm aware of the rule, I want to know why it exists. The player also isn't "free". His salary next season is 10k+. There's functionally no difference between them hiring a player from the market at this price vs getting him via trade right now. And they can afford it since they're paying almost 60k in salaries.
Granted, there's virtually no benefit for the other team, besides saving 2k this last week, so based on that I would be suspicious... but hypothetically if they were saving 10k on a continuing contract, I would call that a fair trade. One team gets a good talent for a league average price and the other team doesn't have to pay his salary.
-- 91 S 63 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
*I keep forgetting this trade happened a while back. Even so, saving 2k is pennies in WL2 and still sus. My point still stands. -- 91 S 63 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0