記者會
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
13 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
13 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
13 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
75 賽季
13 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受
--
75 賽季
13 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
2.2
Koks skirtumas, pas united vis tiek neuzsibus tie zaidejai, paziurejus jo mainus darosi ispudis kad jam tiesiog patinka auksto pot zaidejus ismainyt ir po to tiesiog bankrutuot. As suprantu, visi zaidzia kaip nori man tik klausimas iskilo, kodel united netiko du 9 pot zaidejai bet sitie tiko? Na kad galeciau kitiem mainam pasiruost. Tiem kas sakys "PoT nE ViSka ReIsKiA" sutinku 100% Bet su juo sneketis privaciai yra bergzdias reikalas, potencialai jo nedomina, tada kas? VK? BUvo siulyta su didesniais, pot? Buvo siulyta irgi. Na tikriausiai reikia susitaikyti, kad zmonija neatskleis sio fenomeno..
--
75 賽季
14 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+5
svarbiausiai kad tu 5 lygoj zaidi ir labai daug pasiekes esi
--
75 賽季
14 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
Jo pats 5
--
75 賽季
14 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+1
tai as ir neaiskinu ka ir kaip kitiem daryt
--
75 賽季
14 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已被公平競賽委員會退回
--
75 賽季
17 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
公平競賽委員會決定這筆交易不公平，並向球隊提出警告。
--
75 賽季
17 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Zdanevicius ceiling and value is way higher compared to Bajeris/Barkley <br />
-- 75 賽季 17 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 5<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 2<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
1 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion of a trade with fake team or inactive user<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Zdanevicius ceiling and value is way higher compared to Bajeris/Barkley <br />
-- 75 賽季 17 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0