記者會
交易/租借球員:
球隊提出交易請求
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
71 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
71 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
71 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易後開始在新球隊比賽
--
71 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
交易已接受
--
71 賽季
33 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
這筆交易被檢舉為不公平交易，但是公平競爭委員會決定這筆交易是公平的。
--
71 賽季
36 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
-- 71 賽季 36 天
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 3<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 6<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
<br />
-- 71 賽季 36 天
--
(翻譯)
(翻譯 EN)
+0
1.1