第102賽季回顧！

2025-01-27

作者: dwyane3

這一季可能充滿各種挑戰，但我們很高興與大家分享遊戲中的重要更新、改善和亮點。

優勝者

國際聯賽 1.1

Wǒ bù pà 和 Minnesota Timberwolves 在決賽進行了一系列的默契比賽，以最大化主場比賽的門票收益。

FPC針對這種默契比賽進行了長時間討論後，認為這種行為不符合運動精神，決定對這些球隊進行警告。雖然故意輸球的行為雖然違反規則，但過去幾年一直未受到處罰。自103季起 FPC將不再容忍國際聯賽和國家聯賽中的故意輸球行為，並將進行處罰。我們鼓勵社群檢舉故意輸球的比賽，可以選擇作弊球隊並點擊其頁面上的「檢舉不公平行為」。

儘管 Utenos Green Death 在客場比賽中故意輸球，他們仍以 3:2 的成績在銅牌爭奪戰中擊敗 Sun Tzu。

Hondo Muponda (203公分, 459 RT) 以場均14分和21效率的成績獲得本季MVP。Muponda 是第97賽季由 Huizhou Kylin 選中的第8順位球員，本季在 Utenos Green Death 達到了巔峰。

1. Wǒ bù pà. 經理：YAOQINWEI

2. Minnesota Timberwolves. 經理：史塔克

3. Utenos Green Death. 經理：bicaas

世界盃

中國在一場緊張的防守大戰中以 62:56 擊敗主辦國西班牙奪冠。在比賽中，雙方的領先分數均未超過8分。

本屆比賽的黑馬是香港隊，排名僅第8的他們在銅牌戰中以 74:67 擊敗了立陶宛，為國家隊贏得史上的第一枚銅牌，祝賀他們！

中國隊的 Mad Ghost (223 cm, 394 RT) 獲得本屆MVP；場均 10分和4籃板的數據雖然不算亮眼，但在僅16分鐘內獲得+16的正負值，展示了他的高效。

1. 中國. 經理：WelkinLiu

2. 西班牙. 經理：nofixations

3. 香港. 經理：CoachM0329

U18世界盃

主辦國立陶宛在比賽中展現了統治力，在季後賽中以40+分的優勢擊敗了阿根廷和拉脫維亞。最終，立陶宛以 67:59 的比分輕鬆戰勝中國隊奪冠。

香港U18隊延續了成年隊的步伐，在銅牌戰中以 82:71 擊敗拉脫維亞，贏得了國家歷史上的第一枚U18銅牌！

Tournament hosting Lithuania has been a dominant force in the tournament, blowing past Argentina and Latvia in the playoffs by 40+ points wins. The team did not stop in the final and won against China comfortably 67:59.

立陶宛隊的 Salvijus Potapovas (214 cm, 226 RT) 以場均 25 分和 5 籃板的成績獲得MVP，他僅用場均20分鐘的上場時間就展現了他的壓倒性表現。他已在青年聯賽中稱霸，是否已準備好進軍成人聯賽？

1. 立陶宛. 經理：Sidiav

2. 中國. 經理：WelkinLiu

3. 香港. 經理：DogGor

社群新聞

DanTitan 成為西班牙名人堂的新成員！感謝他為《BasketPulse Giants》雜誌創造的精彩內容，我們期待新一期雜誌的到來！

FPC新聞

近幾個賽季，管理團隊和立陶宛社群的溝通一直存在困難。由於最近幾任聯盟主席的行為不當，FPC已撤銷立陶宛聯盟的代表席位，直至出現真正願意改善情況的新領導者。

第102季更新

修復了選秀位置顯示錯誤的錯誤。
訓練頁面全新設計，將設定和報告頁面合併為一個增強版的訓練頁面。
新增功能，可阻止不被信任的玩家擔任志工職位。
引入一個新選項，如果出現主席行為不當的情況，可提前啟動聯盟主席選舉。
增加功能，可對特定聯盟主席禁用群發訊息功能。
進行多項小型修復和改進。

比賽引擎更新

版本 1.10

- 稍微提升運球技能的影響力

- 修正最後一波進攻經常無法完成投籃的錯誤

近期計劃

很可惜，由於一些意外狀況，我們未能在之前的計劃上取得顯著進展。

我們將開始規劃球員和教練個人技能更新，相關資訊可以在這裡找到。
下一次比賽引擎更新將在接下來的幾個賽季中逐步推出，目的是提升運球技能的重要性，並重新評估近距離投籃的有效性。
包括遊戲系統的內部更新和改善
更新更多舊的設計頁面

祝大家在第103賽季中享受精彩且公平的比賽！

回到首頁

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

遊戲新聞: 第102賽季回顧！

-- 103 賽季 1 天

Season 102 review!

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.14 MikeHoudini

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC." - Does this also mean that there'll be fixes for the significant issues that encourage those intentional losses? -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 keepsmile

the news make a mistake,the MVP of the 102 season in wl1 is Mad Ghost,not Honda Muponda who is only the 60'day MVP -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 keepsmile

有人故意输球就可以说是测试战术，有人就不行，反正一切是裁判说了算，打不赢，我还＂吹"不赢你吗 -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

keepsmile, thanks, fixed. -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.8 LittleMister

Is it possible that with the new training page it is not possible to adjust the training of a newly acquired player (market, scout or draft) on the first day?
Do I have to wait until the first training report to make my settings? -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.3 d0man

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC. We encourage the community to report intentionally lost matches by selecting the cheating team and pressing report unfair behaviour on its page."
A nice instant of making it advantageous to win we will punish players for going what is better for team...
Can't we really implement something that makes winning worth it?
You win fast you receive less money, worse training, or an advantage to play in a league where you don't have chances to earn money.
You intentionally play longer to maximise benefits or losses because you can't financially pay to play in a higher league now FPC punishes you. If you try a new tactic and lose miserable FPC will punish you.

I don't support losing on purpose but if there are no benefits in winning it should be the manager's decision what to do not FPS or Administration. You have many examples of similar cases even in real life where clubs cant cope financially and choose to not get promoted higher. Or when they send their younglings when they don't want to win. -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+27

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

Little mister, thanks for pointing it out, there seemed to be a bug, now it should be ok. -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC."
I told about this last season and the answer was: IT'S NOT IMPORTANT, WE HAVE MORE IMPORTAN THINGS TO FOCUS
Well, maybe I have right. In Spanish WL2, after semifinals ALL TEAMS wanted to lose, because promote to Spanish WL1 is a punish to us. The matches between NL1 and NL2 the same, people are trying his best for lose that matches.
Maybe, solving the issues about WHY is better to stay in NL2 than promote NL1 is the ANSWER, not FPC -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+12

Y 4 zurda10

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 david1992

I just lent my player from the youth team today, and now I cannot change the training for him. -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 klinx

Since years, we ask to give money to every team in NL, Giv less to the first places to just give something to the last ones. So we would fight to stay in the higher league. Financial part of the game is realy huge, and you never want to get 0 from NL1 while people in NL2 can get money being weaker. That's just a non sens ! Just give money to everyone !! That's EASY, SIMPLE, and that's going to solve your "problem" -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.3 5.12 TheWizard

The way the system is now, the National League should just be eliminated. The post about staying in NL2 is better than going to NL1 ( since your finish in NL1 is impossible to be in the top money making positions is near impossible ) is spot on. NL seems to be just a burden. -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.2 4.5 PonasKukas

Klinx, this is what’s known as a collective action problem. It occurs when individuals rely on others to take action, avoiding contribution themselves. As a result, too few people voice the need for change (its not enough for you to say that there is a problem), leading to a suboptimal outcome for the group—in this case, the community. That’s why it’s important for more members of this community to act collectively rather than voicing issues individually. -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 Aurimas.

I just had NL promotion game where both teams was trying to lose and I was the one who failed to do that. Which team should be punished for this game? -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 Aurimas.

I'm playing this game for so long but recent administration actions is blowing my mind with a combination of their inability to solve current problems and a talent to create new problems as well.
Now the game is made, that sometimes losing is way better for the team and instead of changing this dumb system we will punish the users trying to make the best for their team?

For intentional WL losses just make a payout due fast series of expensive tickets, instead of average, as it was suggested 50 seasons ago already. Other intentional losses in the group stage to help a friend or whatever can be punished if there is enough evidences that it was intentional.
NL is a bit different, but its possible to find a solution there as well. And we should look for that solution how to encourage teams to win not because being afraid of getting punished, but because there should be some benefits of winning.
Community is talking about this issue FOR YEARS and nothing was changed. Now nothing was changed too, but somehow administration decided that it would be a great idea to punish users, while administration is responsible for this system we currently have. This is ridiculous. Did administration ever considered punishing themselves for their ignorance of problems community keeps saying them? What about having a discussion to find out actual solutions for problems we have instead of threats banning everybody who actually cares about this game? If Darius have no idea how to communicate with customers maybe somebody else should try? -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+19

3.1 3.3 a-darius

We and the community have slightly different priorities for updates.

One of the biggest factors in how we choose our priorities is our resources. For example, we have more resources to update old pages since we use our freelance developer for that. However, we have far fewer opportunities to work on sensitive topics such as finances or match engine updates.

Another factor is the size of the update. In this case, the community often underestimates the effort required. There are no quick updates when it comes to finances, and there should not be any rushed changes that affect finances for all teams.

Another factor is what we actually want to achieve. Will a finance system update drastically change the game? Will it significantly improve BasketPulse's chances of surviving another year? Will it reduce server issues? Will it attract new users? Will it introduce new possible actions for users?

I agree that such an update would be great and the right way to solve these issues. However, I don’t see any possibility of working on this soon.

You’re saying this is a design flaw and that we should allow complete freedom. Look at the NBA—even such a big organization has "design flaws" and fixes them with "fines." For example, teams risk penalties if they allow their star players to skip games without a good reason.

By the way, that won’t solve the problem, but maybe we should eliminate NT promotion games altogether? If both teams are trying to lose, is there really a point in having them? -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 zurda10

I don't know how much are the prizes of NL1 because I never reached one, and I'm aware that they change depending on league strength, but I know that the winner of our NL2 gets around 55k prize.
Would it really make such a big difference (that can't be adjusted over the season by market offer-demand) to make the Last teams in NL2 earn from ⅓ to an ⅛ part of those 55k (or whatever the TOP prize is in lower league)or something like that?
It wouldn't still pay off too much but at least you get something. I don't think anyone here is asking that the 12th of NL1 gets similar or more than 1st of NL2, just some incentive to promote.

WL doesn't have that issue because even if you finish last after promotion (don't get prize) it really pays off (or at least the loss is minimal compared to NL) just by the tickets income (bigger interest) and the new sponsors. -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 Szulim

This whole idea of punishing community and managers for intentional loss is just stupid. Everybody knows that BasketPulse besides bringing fun of managing your own team - it's business (or should be).
So why the administration are deaf to community and instead of making good changes and encourage new members - they just going downhill and making this game stripped of fun.
And at then end they are supriced that they have more inactive managers then new ones. Shocking -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 4.6 barbabodom

The coaches system is completely broken after the drop in skills due to age was implemented. -- 103 賽季 6 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

顯示隱藏回應: 19

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

Personally, I'm not happy with some of the recent changes to the game myself, but why it should be more fun when non-competitive play and contest distortion should be allowed is beyond me

Szulim.

I can understand the frustration with the financial iniquities (especially the unbalanced funding in some National Leagues) that are mentioned here.

a-Darius has also emphasized that they simply don't have the capacity for a more constructive solution at the moment, because there are constantly new trouble spots that distract from the actual issues. -- 103 賽季 12 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.2 jiasyuan

所以近距離要更新了嗎？ -- 103 賽季 57 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 Rarz09

I'm no longer surprised by anything in this game with its fair play committee, even less transparency when it comes to justifying a canceled exchange... and now with this thing about them punishing with the loss of matches... I think that nowadays if you fart in this game you get a 100k fine, just for anything. -- 103 賽季 57 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

第102賽季回顧！

優勝者

國際聯賽 1.1

世界盃

U18世界盃

社群新聞

快速指南

檢舉這則貼文