俱樂部資訊

核心球員 Mike Houdini

259 RT

年齡: 24 歲

身高: 191 公分

The Great Houdini Hoopsters

國內名稱: The Great Houdini Hoopsters

1.1

5.14

經理: MikeHoudini

F. Littlebury

得分: 17,9

C. Tu

籃板: 5,7

M. Houdini

助攻: 5,0

資訊

最近上線	2025-05-03 01:14
國家	United States
聯盟	USA basketball
俱樂部簡稱	Hoopsters (TGHH)
曾經管理的俱樂部	TLN Heatles (59 - 63 賽季)
籃球學校	Hoopsters 籃球學校

排名

遊戲排名	569 (排名)
國內聯賽排名	7 (排名)
國際聯賽排名	4 (排名)
平均RT	229
球迷俱樂部	466
球迷排名	487 (排名)
國際聯賽人氣排名	10 (排名)
形象	4/7
員工意見	7/7

統計數據

每週贊助收入	39696 Eu
人員薪資上限	91482 Eu
交易限制等級	7 (歷史)
完成交易	25
本季交易	0
全部勝場/比賽	321/455 71%
賽季勝場/比賽	26/32 81%
租借球員數量	1

United States.1.1	7 名次 x 1
World League.5.14	7 名次 x 1

United States.1.1	7 名次
World League.5.14	7 名次

World League.5.14	17 名次
United States.1.1	8 名次

1.1 5.14 Hoopsters

教練: Tobiasz Bednarz (RT: 82)

-- 103 賽季 63 天

與教練續約

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.14 Hoopsters

教練: Vitali Baidachny (RT: 96)

-- 103 賽季 63 天

教練在受限市場期間轉隊

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.14 Hoopsters

球員: Finnegan Littlebury (RT: 227)

-- 103 賽季 63 天

與球員續約

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.4 4.2 a-ramune

遊戲新聞: 國內聯賽獎金制度更新

-- 103 賽季 47 天

Updates in the National League Prizes System

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+34

1.1 2.2 Matis

Hell has Frozen!
Congrats on this. Super excited! -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.2 spiderman

well done -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.14 MikeHoudini

Awesome! :) -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 Cesarrr

Good news! -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.6 3.3 salvius

Great Update!! Better now than never -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 klinx

Finaly you listened the community, thank you, even if it's coming really late. But better late than never ! -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 Hollenbach

Good job! -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.3 2.2 darys

Bravo. -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 4.2 Malakay

Very nice ! -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 2.2 phatman

Don't know from first glance if ideal or far from it, but really good initiative! -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 gianlukk

I agree with the changes, although I have two doubts: the difference in prize money between second place and 5/12th is perhaps too small. Furthermore, I would award the surprise prize of the year to the best performance without excluding the first 3 positions -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

Thank you for these changes. -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 zurda10

As well as when we think you aren't doing things well we criticize, we must applaud when you do things that are great such as in this case.
Thank you for this very much needed rework of the NL reward system and also happy to know that early win bonus will be also updated.
Congratulations team. -- 103 賽季 47 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

Thanks for take us into account.
Great update! -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 smart0eddie

Good news -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 3.1 VanthonyDash

appreciate -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 DanTitan

Thanks for this great update, it is a step in the right direction! -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 2.1 zhiyangxu

Good news, but I say even if you 'slack off and win the Best Surprise Award,' it still needs some adjustments. -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 lantieheuser

Based on user feedback, some excellent adjustments have been made, so I’ve decided not to be the kind of person who only complains and never gives praise.....:P -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.4 sasho-bot

to make NLs more exciting you also need to merge smaller nations together. Bulgaria, Serbia, Slovenia, Croatia, Romania in a Balkan league, Belgium and Netherlands in BNXT league, Denmark, Sweden, Finland, Norway in Scandinavian league, etc. -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+13

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 4.1 RaZeev

Good! -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Y 4 zurda10

sasho I wrote some time ago in Discord about turning national leagues into "federation leagues" but it requires too much effort to be applied as an update. -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 robyrhum

Good news! -- 103 賽季 48 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 ak904

Great job!!!! -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.2 jiasyuan

Good -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 2.2 phatman

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.2 ゞ☆火麒麟☆ゞ

什么意思能翻译下吗 -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.2 pterodaktils

Good update, thanks! -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.1 2.2 phatman

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Y 5 Mirza

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 49 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

Whats happen here? -- 103 賽季 50 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.1 Zaidejas9

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 50 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 Mirza

聯盟志工或管理員隱藏的新聞訊息 -- 103 賽季 50 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 superdzonis

uzdekit man konferenciju bana. vis tiek uz nieka mutinat, tai bent ramybe bus. Uz laisva Lietuva vyrai! -- 103 賽季 50 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+12

顯示隱藏回應: 38

2.2 4.2 saruman

Finally!!! -- 103 賽季 54 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

Y 5 Mirza

Please hide all LT federation messages! -- 103 賽季 54 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.1 5.3 trybfg

頂級球隊投入意願和收入降低（3-8名）、中遊球隊的躺平獎勵（9-16名）以及低級別聯賽生態健康度更加恶劣，希望不要實裝在國際聯賽上。 -- 103 賽季 57 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

遊戲新聞: 第102賽季回顧！

-- 103 賽季 1 天

Season 102 review!

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.14 MikeHoudini

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC." - Does this also mean that there'll be fixes for the significant issues that encourage those intentional losses? -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 keepsmile

the news make a mistake,the MVP of the 102 season in wl1 is Mad Ghost,not Honda Muponda who is only the 60'day MVP -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 1.1 keepsmile

有人故意输球就可以说是测试战术，有人就不行，反正一切是裁判说了算，打不赢，我还＂吹"不赢你吗 -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

keepsmile, thanks, fixed. -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 5.8 LittleMister

Is it possible that with the new training page it is not possible to adjust the training of a newly acquired player (market, scout or draft) on the first day?
Do I have to wait until the first training report to make my settings? -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.3 d0man

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC. We encourage the community to report intentionally lost matches by selecting the cheating team and pressing report unfair behaviour on its page."
A nice instant of making it advantageous to win we will punish players for going what is better for team...
Can't we really implement something that makes winning worth it?
You win fast you receive less money, worse training, or an advantage to play in a league where you don't have chances to earn money.
You intentionally play longer to maximise benefits or losses because you can't financially pay to play in a higher league now FPC punishes you. If you try a new tactic and lose miserable FPC will punish you.

I don't support losing on purpose but if there are no benefits in winning it should be the manager's decision what to do not FPS or Administration. You have many examples of similar cases even in real life where clubs cant cope financially and choose to not get promoted higher. Or when they send their younglings when they don't want to win. -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+27

4.5 4.6 dwyane3

Little mister, thanks for pointing it out, there seemed to be a bug, now it should be ok. -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

"Starting season 103 intentional losses in WL and NL games will not be tolerated and will be punished by the FPC."
I told about this last season and the answer was: IT'S NOT IMPORTANT, WE HAVE MORE IMPORTAN THINGS TO FOCUS
Well, maybe I have right. In Spanish WL2, after semifinals ALL TEAMS wanted to lose, because promote to Spanish WL1 is a punish to us. The matches between NL1 and NL2 the same, people are trying his best for lose that matches.
Maybe, solving the issues about WHY is better to stay in NL2 than promote NL1 is the ANSWER, not FPC -- 103 賽季 1 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+12

Y 4 zurda10

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 1.1 david1992

I just lent my player from the youth team today, and now I cannot change the training for him. -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 klinx

Since years, we ask to give money to every team in NL, Giv less to the first places to just give something to the last ones. So we would fight to stay in the higher league. Financial part of the game is realy huge, and you never want to get 0 from NL1 while people in NL2 can get money being weaker. That's just a non sens ! Just give money to everyone !! That's EASY, SIMPLE, and that's going to solve your "problem" -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.3 5.12 TheWizard

The way the system is now, the National League should just be eliminated. The post about staying in NL2 is better than going to NL1 ( since your finish in NL1 is impossible to be in the top money making positions is near impossible ) is spot on. NL seems to be just a burden. -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

3.2 4.5 PonasKukas

Klinx, this is what’s known as a collective action problem. It occurs when individuals rely on others to take action, avoiding contribution themselves. As a result, too few people voice the need for change (its not enough for you to say that there is a problem), leading to a suboptimal outcome for the group—in this case, the community. That’s why it’s important for more members of this community to act collectively rather than voicing issues individually. -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 Aurimas.

I just had NL promotion game where both teams was trying to lose and I was the one who failed to do that. Which team should be punished for this game? -- 103 賽季 2 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 Aurimas.

I'm playing this game for so long but recent administration actions is blowing my mind with a combination of their inability to solve current problems and a talent to create new problems as well.
Now the game is made, that sometimes losing is way better for the team and instead of changing this dumb system we will punish the users trying to make the best for their team?

For intentional WL losses just make a payout due fast series of expensive tickets, instead of average, as it was suggested 50 seasons ago already. Other intentional losses in the group stage to help a friend or whatever can be punished if there is enough evidences that it was intentional.
NL is a bit different, but its possible to find a solution there as well. And we should look for that solution how to encourage teams to win not because being afraid of getting punished, but because there should be some benefits of winning.
Community is talking about this issue FOR YEARS and nothing was changed. Now nothing was changed too, but somehow administration decided that it would be a great idea to punish users, while administration is responsible for this system we currently have. This is ridiculous. Did administration ever considered punishing themselves for their ignorance of problems community keeps saying them? What about having a discussion to find out actual solutions for problems we have instead of threats banning everybody who actually cares about this game? If Darius have no idea how to communicate with customers maybe somebody else should try? -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

+19

3.1 3.3 a-darius

We and the community have slightly different priorities for updates.

One of the biggest factors in how we choose our priorities is our resources. For example, we have more resources to update old pages since we use our freelance developer for that. However, we have far fewer opportunities to work on sensitive topics such as finances or match engine updates.

Another factor is the size of the update. In this case, the community often underestimates the effort required. There are no quick updates when it comes to finances, and there should not be any rushed changes that affect finances for all teams.

Another factor is what we actually want to achieve. Will a finance system update drastically change the game? Will it significantly improve BasketPulse's chances of surviving another year? Will it reduce server issues? Will it attract new users? Will it introduce new possible actions for users?

I agree that such an update would be great and the right way to solve these issues. However, I don’t see any possibility of working on this soon.

You’re saying this is a design flaw and that we should allow complete freedom. Look at the NBA—even such a big organization has "design flaws" and fixes them with "fines." For example, teams risk penalties if they allow their star players to skip games without a good reason.

By the way, that won’t solve the problem, but maybe we should eliminate NT promotion games altogether? If both teams are trying to lose, is there really a point in having them? -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 zurda10

I don't know how much are the prizes of NL1 because I never reached one, and I'm aware that they change depending on league strength, but I know that the winner of our NL2 gets around 55k prize.
Would it really make such a big difference (that can't be adjusted over the season by market offer-demand) to make the Last teams in NL2 earn from ⅓ to an ⅛ part of those 55k (or whatever the TOP prize is in lower league)or something like that?
It wouldn't still pay off too much but at least you get something. I don't think anyone here is asking that the 12th of NL1 gets similar or more than 1st of NL2, just some incentive to promote.

WL doesn't have that issue because even if you finish last after promotion (don't get prize) it really pays off (or at least the loss is minimal compared to NL) just by the tickets income (bigger interest) and the new sponsors. -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 3.1 Szulim

This whole idea of punishing community and managers for intentional loss is just stupid. Everybody knows that BasketPulse besides bringing fun of managing your own team - it's business (or should be).
So why the administration are deaf to community and instead of making good changes and encourage new members - they just going downhill and making this game stripped of fun.
And at then end they are supriced that they have more inactive managers then new ones. Shocking -- 103 賽季 3 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 4.6 barbabodom

The coaches system is completely broken after the drop in skills due to age was implemented. -- 103 賽季 6 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

顯示隱藏回應: 19

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

Personally, I'm not happy with some of the recent changes to the game myself, but why it should be more fun when non-competitive play and contest distortion should be allowed is beyond me

Szulim.

I can understand the frustration with the financial iniquities (especially the unbalanced funding in some National Leagues) that are mentioned here.

a-Darius has also emphasized that they simply don't have the capacity for a more constructive solution at the moment, because there are constantly new trouble spots that distract from the actual issues. -- 103 賽季 12 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

2.2 2.2 jiasyuan

所以近距離要更新了嗎？ -- 103 賽季 57 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

1.1 2.1 Rarz09

I'm no longer surprised by anything in this game with its fair play committee, even less transparency when it comes to justifying a canceled exchange... and now with this thing about them punishing with the loss of matches... I think that nowadays if you fart in this game you get a 100k fine, just for anything. -- 103 賽季 57 天

-- (翻譯) (翻譯 EN)

俱樂部資訊

The Great Houdini Hoopsters

國內名稱: The Great Houdini Hoopsters

資訊

排名

統計數據

重大成就

103 賽季

102 賽季

俱樂部資訊

The Great Houdini Hoopsters

國內名稱: The Great Houdini Hoopsters

資訊

排名

統計數據

重大成就

103 賽季

102 賽季

快速指南

檢舉這則貼文