Информация об обмене
Отменено
| Информация | |
|---|---|
| Начало переговоров | 2021-01-02- 11:20 |
| Окончание переговоров | 2021-01-02- 16:13 |
| Уровень ограничений | |
|
Aurėlijus Lilenas | |||
| Оклад: | 13047 Eu | |||
| Контракт: | 1 сез. | Возраст: | 24 г. | |
| КС: | 256 | Рост: | 203 см | |
| Потенциал: | 9 | |||
|
Kemen Herencia
|
|||
| Оклад: | 11589 Eu | |||
| Контракт: | 4 сез. | Возраст: | 26 г. | |
| КС: | 239 | Рост: | 196 см | |
| Потенциал: | 6 | |||
5.13
Обмен (Сделка)/Одолжение игроков:
+0
Показать скрытые ответы: 4
По решению комитета «Честная игра» обмен отменён
--
79 сез.
27 д.
--
(Переводить)
(Переводить EN)
+0
Сообщалось, что эти обмены были несправедливыми. Комитет Честной игры решил, что эти обмены несправедливы, и обе команды были наказаны.
--
79 сез.
27 д.
--
(Переводить)
(Переводить EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 сез. 27 д.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 6<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 2<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 1<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
4 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players' trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Same trade was rejected few days ago by FTC. Troll FTC should not be an option<br />
--- club was advised to add some youngsters to make a deal equal, but did not listen to fpc recommendations<br />
-- 79 сез. 27 д.
--
(Переводить)
(Переводить EN)
+0
