Trade information

Povraćeno

Informacija
Start of negotiation 2021-12-20- 05:35
End of negotiation 2021-12-20- 14:51
Restrictions' level 7
logo
Orlando Salgueiro
Plata: 5084 Eu
Ugovor: 3 S Godine: 27 g.
RT: 196 Visina: 194 cm.
Potencijal: 1
Bronius Girskis
Plata: 3333 Eu
Ugovor: 2 S Godine: 26 g.
RT: 181 Visina: 192 cm.
Potencijal: 8
Bie Chu
Plata: 3333 Eu
Ugovor: 3 S Godine: 20 g.
RT: 113 Visina: 194 cm.
Potencijal: 7
logo
João Junior Huck
Plata: 17365 Eu
Ugovor: 5 S Godine: 20 g.
RT: 183 Visina: 205 cm.
Potencijal: 10
Icon Trejd/Lending players: Palmeiras & Firer's
-- 85 S 1 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Show hidden replies: 7
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 11<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
5 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- João Junior Huck (Predicted peak RT 379) - disbalance from level of other players involved in trade<br />
 -- 85 S 4 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
This trade reduced the other team´s payroll the max it could (his desire) and landed him two starters, one of them a rare 200ish Brazilian player + a young player with potential 7. I disagree with this call. -- 85 S 5 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Player was cut from the original team because it went bankrupcy, with our trade would have avoided. -- 85 S 7 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0