Darījuma informācija

Atgriezts

Informācija
Pārrunu sākšana 2021-12-20- 05:35
Pārrunu beigšana 2021-12-20- 14:51
Ierobežojumu līmenis 7
Orlando Salgueiro
Alga: 5084 Eu
Līgums: 3 S Vecums: 27 g.
RT: 196 Garums: 194 cm.
Potenciāls: 1
Bronius Girskis
Alga: 3333 Eu
Līgums: 2 S Vecums: 26 g.
RT: 181 Garums: 192 cm.
Potenciāls: 8
Bie Chu
Alga: 3333 Eu
Līgums: 3 S Vecums: 20 g.
RT: 113 Garums: 194 cm.
Potenciāls: 7
João Junior Huck
Alga: 17365 Eu
Līgums: 5 S Vecums: 20 g.
RT: 183 Garums: 205 cm.
Potenciāls: 10
Icon Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji: Palmeiras & Firer's
-- 85 S 1 d.
Komanda izteica maiņas darījuma piedāvājumu
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 7
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 11<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
3 - Overuse of disbalanced trades. Players&#39; trade somehow has to benefit both teams (financially, in respect of team composition, etc). Good but expensive player can be traded to a bit worse but cheaper player. This type of trade can not be overused.<br />
5 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- João Junior Huck (Predicted peak RT 379) - disbalance from level of other players involved in trade<br />
-- 85 S 4 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
This trade reduced the other team´s payroll the max it could (his desire) and landed him two starters, one of them a rare 200ish Brazilian player + a young player with potential 7. I disagree with this call. -- 85 S 5 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Player was cut from the original team because it went bankrupcy, with our trade would have avoided. -- 85 S 7 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0