Информации за тргување/размена

Прифатено

Информација
Почеток на преговорите	2022-06-30- 15:57
Крај на преговорите	2022-06-30- 15:58
Ниво на ограничувања	10

Big Other

	Huan Lei
	Плата:	30820 Eu
	Договор:	1 С	Возраст:	30 вг.
	ПцС:	337	Висина:	218 см
	Потенцијал:	7
	Ni Han
	Плата:	12569 Eu
	Договор:	5 С	Возраст:	24 вг.
	ПцС:	259	Висина:	204 см
	Потенцијал:	7
	Peng Zuo
	Плата:	11071 Eu
	Договор:	4 С	Возраст:	24 вг.
	ПцС:	251	Висина:	201 см
	Потенцијал:	8
	Tomas Oteiza
	Плата:	2632 Eu
	Договор:	5 С	Возраст:	18 вг.
	ПцС:	105	Висина:	184 см
	Потенцијал:	8

Huizhou Kylin

	She zhang
	Плата:	-
	Договор:	Талент од школа	Возраст:	15 вг.
	ПцС:	56	Висина:	189 см
	Потенцијал:	10

2.2 1.1 Big Other

Тргување/размена/Играчи ставени за позајмица: Big Other & Kylin

-- 88 С 4 д

Тимот на клубот даде понуда за тргување/размена

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Играч:

Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената -- 88 С 4 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Играч:

Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената -- 88 С 4 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Играч: Peng Zuo

Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената -- 88 С 4 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Играч:

Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената -- 88 С 4 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Играч: She zhang

Почна да игра во нов тим по тргувањето/размената -- 88 С 4 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Прифатена е понудата за тргување/размена -- 88 С 4 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Фер плеј комисија

Ова тргување/разменување беше пријавено како нефер. Сепак, Фер плеј комисијата одлучи дека ова тргување/разменување е фер. -- 88 С 11 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Фер плеј комисија

How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- unfair trade for competition. Level 10 restrictions does not provide a chance to do whatever trade users decide.<br />
-- 88 С 11 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

The voted results shocked me, maybe some the FPC members should have to improve their abilities in my opinion.
My goal in this deal is to get TOP players. Does anyone know how many 14-15 yr with 10 pot players have been scouted in the past few seasons? That's the value of this 10 pot player . RUN is trade for combat player and long term player.
One voted "Salary drop" ,I don't understand it very well. Lei is power player with good health for WL1.1. Both Han and Zuo is 24 yr loaned player. And their weekly salaries are very low.
Level 10 has a big advantage in the trade, but that's no reason to voted for unfair trade. -- 88 С 12 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

Even if the value for a 15 yo Pot10 player is accordingly high, how many users in the game do you think could make that exact trade?
Right. Almost nobody.

You give away 57092 Eu salary and take in 0 Eu.
That alone defies any logic for me.
In addition, such a trade shifts any balance in the lower leagues, if there are players who actually do not belong there.

You are shocked by the result of the vote.
I am shocked that the trade was not revoked.
That's how different the opinions are!

Quote from a FPC member: "Level 10 restrictions does not provide a chance to do whatever trade users decide."
In my opinion, this is absolutely the case here. -- 88 С 12 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+2

What's problem i trading excellent 10 potential players for instant player, we accord with level 10 trade rules, unequal salary is allowed between two teams, There is no problem as long as there is equality of value between us players -- 88 С 12 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Прикажи скриени одговори: 11

In your opinion, if the transaction is based on salary and not value, then you want game developers not to open up level 10 transactions -- 88 С 12 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

Lipinski You're wrong, this is not the first time such a deal has been made.There will be more and more level 10 users in the future. In case you didn't know, most users were able to improve their restrictions' level for credits from last season.
I don't want to say anything more about the salary. Suggest that you give your opinion to the administrator. On a side note, when I first saw a similar level 10 deal, I went to report it just like you did. Later in the last season when I went to Upgrade to level 10.
The purpose of the trade is not to keep the league balanced. -- 88 С 12 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+0

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

I got your point. I'm not holding you personally responsible either.

Unfortunately, it's just that with the recent changes to the Trade Restriction Rules (Upgrades via Credits spent), it's becoming more and more pay-to-win.
That is a great pity.

Unfortunately, the game administration will not be dissuaded from their plans by my opinion. -- 88 С 12 д

-- (Преведи) (Преведи EN)

+3