Información de intercambios

Aceptado

Informacion
Inicio de la negociación	2022-06-30- 15:57
Fin de la negociación	2022-06-30- 15:58
Nivel de restricciones	10

Big Other

	Huan Lei
	Salario:	30820 Eu
	Contrato:	1 S	Edad:	30 Edad
	RT:	337	Altura:	218 cm.
	Potencial:	7
	Ni Han
	Salario:	12569 Eu
	Contrato:	5 S	Edad:	24 Edad
	RT:	259	Altura:	204 cm.
	Potencial:	7
	Peng Zuo
	Salario:	11071 Eu
	Contrato:	4 S	Edad:	24 Edad
	RT:	251	Altura:	201 cm.
	Potencial:	8
	Tomas Oteiza
	Salario:	2632 Eu
	Contrato:	5 S	Edad:	18 Edad
	RT:	105	Altura:	184 cm.
	Potencial:	8

Huizhou Kylin

	She zhang
	Salario:	-
	Contrato:	T. escolar	Edad:	15 Edad
	RT:	56	Altura:	189 cm.
	Potencial:	10

2.2 1.1 Big Other

Intercambio/Jugadores para prestámos: Big Other & Kylin

-- 88 S 4 Dia

El equipo hizo una oferta de intercambio.

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Jugador:

Comenzó a jugar en un nuevo equipo después de un intercambio. -- 88 S 4 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Jugador:

Comenzó a jugar en un nuevo equipo después de un intercambio. -- 88 S 4 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Jugador: Peng Zuo

Comenzó a jugar en un nuevo equipo después de un intercambio. -- 88 S 4 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Jugador:

Comenzó a jugar en un nuevo equipo después de un intercambio. -- 88 S 4 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Jugador: She zhang

Comenzó a jugar en un nuevo equipo después de un intercambio. -- 88 S 4 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Oferta de intercambio aceptada -- 88 S 4 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Comité del juego limpio

Este intercambio fue reportado como injusto. Sin embargo, el comité de juego limpio decidió que este intercambio es justo. -- 88 S 11 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Comité del juego limpio

How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 4<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 5<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Salary drop (one or more useful players are exchanged for useless player(s) with the only goal to reduce salaries)<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- unfair trade for competition. Level 10 restrictions does not provide a chance to do whatever trade users decide.<br />
-- 88 S 11 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

The voted results shocked me, maybe some the FPC members should have to improve their abilities in my opinion.
My goal in this deal is to get TOP players. Does anyone know how many 14-15 yr with 10 pot players have been scouted in the past few seasons? That's the value of this 10 pot player . RUN is trade for combat player and long term player.
One voted "Salary drop" ,I don't understand it very well. Lei is power player with good health for WL1.1. Both Han and Zuo is 24 yr loaned player. And their weekly salaries are very low.
Level 10 has a big advantage in the trade, but that's no reason to voted for unfair trade. -- 88 S 12 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

Even if the value for a 15 yo Pot10 player is accordingly high, how many users in the game do you think could make that exact trade?
Right. Almost nobody.

You give away 57092 Eu salary and take in 0 Eu.
That alone defies any logic for me.
In addition, such a trade shifts any balance in the lower leagues, if there are players who actually do not belong there.

You are shocked by the result of the vote.
I am shocked that the trade was not revoked.
That's how different the opinions are!

Quote from a FPC member: "Level 10 restrictions does not provide a chance to do whatever trade users decide."
In my opinion, this is absolutely the case here. -- 88 S 12 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+2

What's problem i trading excellent 10 potential players for instant player, we accord with level 10 trade rules, unequal salary is allowed between two teams, There is no problem as long as there is equality of value between us players -- 88 S 12 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Mostrar respuestas ocultas: 11

In your opinion, if the transaction is based on salary and not value, then you want game developers not to open up level 10 transactions -- 88 S 12 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

Lipinski You're wrong, this is not the first time such a deal has been made.There will be more and more level 10 users in the future. In case you didn't know, most users were able to improve their restrictions' level for credits from last season.
I don't want to say anything more about the salary. Suggest that you give your opinion to the administrator. On a side note, when I first saw a similar level 10 deal, I went to report it just like you did. Later in the last season when I went to Upgrade to level 10.
The purpose of the trade is not to keep the league balanced. -- 88 S 12 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+0

1.1 4.3 Lipinski

I got your point. I'm not holding you personally responsible either.

Unfortunately, it's just that with the recent changes to the Trade Restriction Rules (Upgrades via Credits spent), it's becoming more and more pay-to-win.
That is a great pity.

Unfortunately, the game administration will not be dissuaded from their plans by my opinion. -- 88 S 12 Dia

-- (Traducir) (Traducir EN)

+3