Darījuma informācija
Atgriezts
Informācija | |
---|---|
Pārrunu sākšana | 2022-11-25- 23:40 |
Pārrunu beigšana | 2022-11-26- 01:17 |
Ierobežojumu līmenis |
|
Elvinas Ramoška | |||
Alga: | - | |||
Līgums: | Skolas talants | Vecums: | 16 g. | |
RT: | 92 | Garums: | 185 cm. | |
Potenciāls: | 8 |
|
Utenis Obelienis | |||
Alga: | 28543 Eu | |||
Līgums: | 1 S | Vecums: | 26 g. | |
RT: | 358 | Garums: | 210 cm. | |
Potenciāls: | 1 | |||
|
Samsonas Kotelis | |||
Alga: | - | |||
Līgums: | Skolas talants | Vecums: | 14 g. | |
RT: | 26 | Garums: | 186 cm. | |
Potenciāls: | 7 |
+0
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 24
also, dear FPC, i have two players, with peak RT you consider to be too bad for wl1 - are they playing too bad? https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Player/2174811/description https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Player/2129166/description
I agree general FPC rule book would be needed. Potential 8 is very much fine for wl1 -- 90 S 31 d.
I agree general FPC rule book would be needed. Potential 8 is very much fine for wl1 -- 90 S 31 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+4
And they can be much cheaper than 9 and 10 pot players, which is an advantage in the NE. I don’t know why FPC member often try to talk down 8 pots, even 7-pot can be useful in WL1.
--
90 S
31 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+3