Darījuma informācija

Akceptēts

Informācija
Pārrunu sākšana 2020-12-07- 00:38
Pārrunu beigšana 2020-12-07- 07:58
Ierobežojumu līmenis 7
Manex Pavieta
Alga: 9250 Eu
Līgums: 3 S Vecums: 26 g.
RT: 219 Garums: 209 cm.
Potenciāls: 6
José Zubiaga
Alga: 7131 Eu
Līgums: 5 S Vecums: 16 g.
RT: 81 Garums: 204 cm.
Potenciāls: 9
flag Guillermo Pazos
Alga: 9244 Eu
Līgums: 1 S Vecums: 32 g.
RT: 263 Garums: 190 cm.
Potenciāls: 5
Manel Tablares
Alga: 12403 Eu
Līgums: 5 S Vecums: 27 g.
RT: 258 Garums: 197 cm.
Potenciāls: 8
Icon Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji: Almorranas & CB CUCALÓN
-- 79 S 1 d.
Komanda izteica maiņas darījuma piedāvājumu
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 7
My project is to reach WL3 asap, because i need to build my club's structure with a high-performance YT and start investing in scouted coaches. I need players with inmediate performance, and the players that i'm receiving have +60% and +25% in his inner health potential, so that they may last for years after they would be 30. In fact, Tablares has already more than 300 extra health points, so they may be very experienced.

In my school, i already have many players with a great future: 4 with POT 8, 2 with POT 7 and 3 with POT 6. I'm only trading one player to make my project real, my future is guaranteed with my current school players.

Pavieta is just a filler to adjust salaries, so it is in fact a 2x1 trade.

I attach Zubiaga's inner potentials. Despite his height, he is not a Center or PF (his skills are more accurate for a PG or a SG):

Potentials of skills
H Jmp Spd Tgh 1 2c 2m 3 Reb CS DIQ Drb Ast OIQ Exp
+25% +10% -10% -50% +10% -50% -50% -5% Avg +5% +15% +30% +20% +50%

Hope FPC may understand my current needs.
Regards
-- 79 S 1 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+1
Šis darījums tika ziņots kā negodīgs. Tomēr, Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir godīgs. -- 79 S 1 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 9<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
-- 79 S 1 d.
-- (Tulkot) (Tulkot EN)
+0