Trade information

Accepted

Information
Start of negotiation 2020-12-07- 00:38
End of negotiation 2020-12-07- 07:58
Restrictions' level 7
Manex Pavieta
Salary: 9250 Eu
Contract: 3 S Age: 26 y.
RT: 219 Height: 209 cm.
Potential: 6
José Zubiaga
Salary: 7131 Eu
Contract: 5 S Age: 16 y.
RT: 81 Height: 204 cm.
Potential: 9
flag Guillermo Pazos
Salary: 9244 Eu
Contract: 1 S Age: 32 y.
RT: 263 Height: 190 cm.
Potential: 5
Manel Tablares
Salary: 12403 Eu
Contract: 5 S Age: 27 y.
RT: 258 Height: 197 cm.
Potential: 8
Icon Trade/Lending players: Almorranas & CB CUCALÓN
-- 79 S 1 d.
Team made a trade offer
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
Show hidden replies: 7
My project is to reach WL3 asap, because i need to build my club's structure with a high-performance YT and start investing in scouted coaches. I need players with inmediate performance, and the players that i'm receiving have +60% and +25% in his inner health potential, so that they may last for years after they would be 30. In fact, Tablares has already more than 300 extra health points, so they may be very experienced.

In my school, i already have many players with a great future: 4 with POT 8, 2 with POT 7 and 3 with POT 6. I'm only trading one player to make my project real, my future is guaranteed with my current school players.

Pavieta is just a filler to adjust salaries, so it is in fact a 2x1 trade.

I attach Zubiaga's inner potentials. Despite his height, he is not a Center or PF (his skills are more accurate for a PG or a SG):

Potentials of skills
H Jmp Spd Tgh 1 2c 2m 3 Reb CS DIQ Drb Ast OIQ Exp
+25% +10% -10% -50% +10% -50% -50% -5% Avg +5% +15% +30% +20% +50%

Hope FPC may understand my current needs.
Regards
-- 79 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+1
This trade was reported as unfair. However, the Fair play committee decided that this trade is fair. -- 79 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert and punish&quot;: 0<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Revert&quot;: 2<br />
- volunteers voted &quot;Fair&quot;: 9<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade&rsquo;s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
1 - Significantly unfair to other users (for example, when strong and cheap player is moved to lower division).<br />
<br />
-- 79 S 1 d.
-- (Translate) (Translate EN)
+0