Spēlētāja informācija
Šī lapa satur informāciju par virtulālās spēles tēlu. Jebkuras sakritības ar reāliem cilvēkiem (vārds, uzvārds vai cita informācija) ir nejauša un neparedzēta.
x3
x1
x2
x1
Yannick Renoir
- Forma:
- Pārguris
- Vecums:
- 27 g.
- Garums:
- 206 cm. (6' 9'' )
- Pozīcija:
- PF (SF)
- Stipruma likme (RT):
- 254
- Prognozētais augstākais RT:
- 281
- Potenciāls:
- 9
Prasmes
Veselība
Atlētiskums:
Precizitāte:
Aizsardzība:
Uzbrukums:
Līguma informācija
| Termiņš | 4 S |
| Alga | 13 442 Eu |
| Viedoklis | Perfekti |
Tirgus informācija
| Minimālā pieprasītā alga | 11 868 Eu |
Draftu informācija
| Līga |
World League.3.2
|
| Sezona | 89 |
| Komanda | KK caplje megateam |
| Izvēles numurs | #17 |
1.1
Spēlētājs:
+0
+0
Maiņa/Aizdotie spēlētāji:
+0
1.1
1.1
+0
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 4
Maiņas darījumu atcēla Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC)
--
94 S
21 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir negodīgs un abas darījumā iesaistītās komandas saņēma brīdinājumus.
--
94 S
21 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 S 21 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 10<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 0<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
7 - Trade constitutes a "hidden lending" (player(s) that changed team went back to the original team)<br />
2 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
2 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Hide lending. Not allowed this type of tfades.<br />
--- It's still hidden lending after last vote and additionally it's worse deal than before.<br />
-- 94 S 21 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
+0
Parādīt paslēptās ziņas: 5
Šis darījums tika ziņots kā negodīgs. Tomēr, Godīgas Spēles komiteja (FPC) nolēma, ka šis darījums ir godīgs.
--
94 S
19 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
How the Fair Play Committee members voted:<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 S 19 d.
- volunteers voted "Revert and punish": 0<br />
- volunteers voted "Revert": 1<br />
- volunteers voted "Fair": 11<br />
<br />
These reasons were chosen by the volunteers during voting:<br />
1 - Suspicion that trade’s goal is to help one of the teams<br />
<br />
1 - Other reasons. Volunteers wrote explanations: <br />
--- Not allowed to trade back same players in the same season<br />
-- 94 S 19 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
Hi, i dont really know why the trade was bot aproved, ne and the manager of KK caplje discussed a lot of days how we could make the deal happen. We also had to divide in 2 separate trades because there were many players involved in the trade. There are a lot of benefits for BOTH of us to make this deal happen. Me geting a few young players (and a lot weaker than what i gave) to help me reach WL4 in the near future and for my trade partner to reduce his salary, reduce maintenence of the school and geting a WL1 player in return, also the players he used in this trade werent strong enough for his team anyway. Why is this wrong? Without no explanation the trade didnt passed. Can someone be kind and give me 1 explanation? Thank you :)
--
94 S
20 d.
--
(Tulkot)
(Tulkot EN)
+0
- Shape: Not prepared
- Shape: Almost not prepared
- Shape: Excellent
- Shape: Tired
- Shape: Exhausted
- Not registrable for match
- Franchise player
- Team captain
- School talent
- Player has ended his career
- Club wants to trade this player
- Club doesn't want to trade this player
- Transferring player is currently not allowed
- Player is on loan (contract with another club)
- Is going to end his career in the end of the season
- Good dunker
- Good defender
- Good 3-point shooter
- Good playmaker
- Gold medal
- Silver medal
- Bronze medal
- MVP of the season
- In season's TOP5
- The most perspective in league
- Participant of the All Star day