Mainų informacija

Priimtas

Informacija
Derybų pradžia 2023-01-26- 01:47
Derybų pabaiga 2023-01-26- 19:01
Apribojimų lygis 10
flag Jean Reaidy Žaidėjas yra paskolintas ir negalės žaisti jūsų komandoje iki sezono pabaigos
Alga: 2734 Eu
Kontraktas: 1 sez. Amžius: 20 m.
VK: 168 Ūgis: 221 cm.
Potencialas: 6
Tarik Foucault
Alga: -
Kontraktas: Mok. talentas Amžius: 16 m.
VK: 55 Ūgis: 201 cm.
Potencialas: 3
Icon Mainai/Žaidėjų skolinimas: Wǒ bù pà & Lucky Rats
-- 91 sez. 25 d.
Komanda pateikė mainų pasiūlymą
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
Rodyti paslėptus atsakymus: 34
oj patikek as ju neginu:D man tiesiog yra keista, kai tiek daug zmoniu uzkliuna tie mainai, kai jau tiek laiko praeje:D reikejo floodint is kart, gal butumet ka pakeite -- 91 sez. 62 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+1
I'm aware of the rule, I want to know why it exists. The player also isn't "free". His salary next season is 10k+. There's functionally no difference between them hiring a player from the market at this price vs getting him via trade right now. And they can afford it since they're paying almost 60k in salaries.
Granted, there's virtually no benefit for the other team, besides saving 2k this last week, so based on that I would be suspicious... but hypothetically if they were saving 10k on a continuing contract, I would call that a fair trade. One team gets a good talent for a league average price and the other team doesn't have to pay his salary.
-- 91 sez. 63 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0
*I keep forgetting this trade happened a while back. Even so, saving 2k is pennies in WL2 and still sus. My point still stands. -- 91 sez. 63 d.
-- (Versti) (Versti EN)
+0