Klubo informacija

Vardinis žaidėjas Herkus Kalnietis

130 VK

Amžius: 19 m.

Ūgis: 189 cm.

The Onions

Vietinis pavadinimas: Cibuliai

3.2

3.1

Vadovas: a-ramune

A. Levy

Taškai: 16,1

E. Kontrimas

Atkovoti kamuoliai: 4,2

D. Meškauskas

Perdavimai: 3,1

Informacija

Aktyvumas	2022-09-27 18:17
Šalis	Lithuania
Federacija	Lithuanian Basketball Federation
Komandos pav. trumpai	Onions (Onio)
Klubas, kuriam vadovauta anksčiau	Cibuliai(Closed) (1 - 46 sez.)
Krepšinio mokykla	Onions Krepšinio mokykla
Jaunimo komanda	The Onions Youth

Reitingai

Stipriausi žaidime	273 ( vieta reitinguose)
Stipriausi nac. lygoje	6 ( vieta reitinguose)
Stipriausi tarpt. lygoje	26 ( vieta reitinguose)
VK vidurkis	251
Fanų klubas	610
Fanų reitingas	286 ( vieta reitinguose)
Pop. reitingas tarpt. lygoje	32 ( vieta reitinguose)
Įvaizdis	6/7
Personalo nuomonė	6/7

Statistika

Rėmėjų lėšos per savaitę	92814 Eu
Max suma personalo algoms	340034 Eu
Mainų apribojimų lygis	8 (Istorija)
Visų mainų kiekis	1
Mainų kiekis sezone	0
Pergalių/žaista rungtynių klubo istorijoje	536/1065 50%
Pergalių/žaista rungtynių šį sezoną	4/29 14%
Pasiskolintų žaidėjų kiekis	13 (Statistika)

3.2 3.1 a-ramune

Žaidimo naujienos: Ar dvitaškių ir tritaškių pataikymas realistiškas?

-- 89 sez. 29 d.

New article - info about shooting accuracy from various distance

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

+12

2.2 1.1 DarjusKleins

I would like to know more stats:
-5 SR percentage in different shooting situations
0 SR percentage in different shooting situations
5 SR percentage in different shooting situations.
I hope that your decisions depends on this data. -- 89 sez. 29 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.2 3.1 a-ramune

Testing Match engine has been updated:

https://www.basketpulse.com/lt/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_632c567404b00 -- 89 sez. 29 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 5.1 zurda10

I don't think 67% mid-range in good situations is way far from where it should be. Maybe the thing is if there are too many good situations or if the mid-range shooting volume is way higher than irl, where it's almost unused, except for precise situations or with specific specialists players.
But I'd say people like Cory Higgins or Lorenzo Brown (specialists) could be around 75% on GOOD SITUATION mid-range shots, which would make that 67% as a mean quite accurate).
I agree with the Close range and three pointer discussion. -- 89 sez. 29 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 joancrumor

But what is the problem with the shot... improve the defense system, it is incredible with a bad situation and -5 in shooting with a good defender +X defending hit almost all the shots -- 89 sez. 29 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.1 TheWizardKs

I have noticed the 2C accuracy has been too high as if my people got zapped by a microwave signal that made them forget what defense is. It took so long to respond that we may get demoted as a result of concentrating so much on defense. -- 89 sez. 29 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 3.4 dwyane3

DarjusKleins sure:
Three point range accuracy based on shooting situation. W1-3. Shooting skill (9-11)
Situation Accuracy (%)
Perfect 44
Good 44
Average 43
Bad 40
Allmost impossible 42
Close range accuracy based on shooting situation. W1-3. Shooting skill (9-11)
Situation Accuracy (%)
Perfect 96
Good 95
Average 74
Bad 2643 1013 38
Allmost impossible 1026 115 11
Middle range accuracy based on shooting situation. W1-3. Shooting skill (9-11)
Situation Accuracy (%)
Perfect 73
Good 67
Average 41
Bad 21
Allmost impossible 8

zurda10 yes, it is not way too far from reality, we will tweak it slightly. Leading NBA mid-range shooters shoot all mid-range shots in the interval between 42 and 61%.

joancrumor yes, this is a problem with 3pt shots and it has been fixed in the testing engine and we are monitoring now if it needs to be updated anymore. We are also assessing the shot contesting skill influence on shooting percentage and will update you about it in the next post. -- 89 sez. 30 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.5 bananajohn

For me accuracy is ok. Only one thing I don't understand is these "Lucky" and "Unlucky" shots... So many of them during game. -- 89 sez. 30 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

Rodyti paslėptus atsakymus: 7

2.1 3.4 Saulys

Kos pataikymas dvitaskiu ir tritaskiu po atkovotu kamuoliu puolime?
Ten vejai svilpia jau seniai, siandien atkovota puolime 12 kamuoliu, bet. naudos 0, nes nesigebeta imest nei vieno tasko po atkovotu kamuoliu, taip nutinka maziausiai 15 rungtyniu per sezona. -- 89 sez. 30 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 3.4 Saulys

pasiziurejau dabar paskutines savo 4 rungtynes, puolime atkovota nuo 9 iki 13 kamuoliu, per ketverias rungtynes nepelnytas nei vienas taskas atsikovojus kamuoli :-/ -- 89 sez. 30 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 1.1 DarjusKleins

Thanks for additional information.
Let's talk more about this case. Let's talk about three points.
The same percentage is from all different shooting situations. It means that chances to score points against perfect defence and without defence is the same.
I think less skilled player than defender should score around: 60%, 40%, 20%, 10%, 5%.
Equal attacker against defender:
60%, 45%, 35%, 20%, 10%.
Better attacker than defender:
60%, 50%, 45%; 35%; 25%.
Or something like that -- 89 sez. 31 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.2 3.1 a-ramune

Žaidimo naujienos: Kodėl žaidėjai nepataiko baudų metimų?

-- 89 sez. 23 d.

New article - detailed information about Free throws in the game

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 Mirza

As a result, we have slightly increased the base free throw shooting percentage (especially for the players with bad skills) - don't think this will give a motivation to train more 2M :) -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.3 Frankebasta

" in a test engine that is live in national leagues. "

do you mean that we are playing with different GE in National and WL?

That's news to me!
Good to know.
As it ALWAYS happens in this game, we are playing without knowing the rules applied to our choices.

It's a great satisfaction to be treated like a 3 year-old child.
By lovely parents, I surmise -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 Mirza

frankebaste we are playing with different ME in WL and NL the last few seasons already. Everybody knows it :) -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.3 a-darius

Frankebasta
We wrote about that at least few times. In case you missed:

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/News/article/62bae5d10e91d/match-engine-update-roadmap -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.3 Frankebasta

a-darius wrote:
"Season 89 day 1 - the new match engine will be used in the whole game"

That's exactly why i'm FLABBERGASTED!
I didn't miss the news article.
I missed the obvious single entendre ...... Admin's news release must never be trusted

How can you tell us that "THE NEW MATCH ENGINE WILL BE USED IN THE WHOLE GAME"
(which, by the way, is NOT proper english)
And now you nonchalantly pretend that it's ME WHO DOESN'T know that we play 2 different GE

It is beyond me to argue with such a logic -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.3 Frankebasta

Mirza wrote
" frankebaste we are playing with different ME in WL and NL the last few seasons already. Everybody knows it :) "

as conveniently a-darius pointed out:
"Season 89 day 1 - the new match engine will be used in the whole game"

I assumed that we are way past Season 89 day1
On my browser it reads: s89d23.
Maybe it's my O.S. at fault. Maybe I live in a different time zone.
Dunno -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 1.1 Gudrioji Lape

why to remove impact of experience? i believe this should be a factor? -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.3 a-darius

In the same article (just a few lines below) we informed that we will continue our work with updating ME and these updates will be visible in the national league.

So, If someone understood that differently I try to explain:
All ME updates (except critical bugs) firstly goes to testing ME.
Testing ME is used in national leagues
Every one or two seasons the main match engine will be updated so that it is the same as testing (that happened on the first day of this season)
We plan to continue this cycle as long as it is needed.

In the near future we also plan to create a ME change log article in game’s help, where all ME updates will be logged in one place. -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.3 Frankebasta

a-darius wrote:
"In the same article (just a few lines below) we informed that we will continue our work with updating ME and these updates will be visible in the national league."

.... and that's what I read in the official press release:
"After that we plan that our work with ME never stops and we will be constantly updating it."

no mention of National League.
Which I (wrongly, as it turned out) assumed it was the ONE AND ONLY GE that you stated one line before.

A suggestion, for a-darius and all the Admins and FPC members: if your english is not good enough to properly express your thoughts, try using Google translate.
Even a spell checker will help, in most instances.
Better yet, ask some game user to check your messages before posting in press release for everybody to see.

It's been a few years since the english language was chosen as the game official language.
But it is..... NOT WORKING WELL -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.2 Lipinski

Alter, nimm einfach deine Pillen. -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

+15

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

lipinski XD -- 89 sez. 23 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.2 konapan

3P shooters usually are good with FT. Some 2P players are really good FT shooters. Free throw player' skills should be calculated like this: FT=(0.15*2P skills)+(0.5*MidRange skills)+(0.35*3P skills). Is this possible? -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.4 fungtys

Mid-range is encourage to train more by influencing free throws. Good way to start. Maybe 2/3 mid-range + 1/3 3pt. Just an idea for reference. Thank you. -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 5.9 coldmeow

I agree with them that 3pt should be added to the calculation formula of FT, which is obviously more reasonable and more realistic。 -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.1 2.1 darys

Please stop debating this, this is definitely not happening anytime soon. The administration has already spoken about this situation:

"About changing the formula and also regarding three points skill.
Some users trained middle range skill to have a good free-throw shooter. I don't see any good reason why we should punish these users just because some other users ignored this.
You decided to save training points in this area, and now you pay the cost that you knew would be. Just because of this your decisions there is no logic to change how the match engine works." -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.3 5.4 timmy296701

If a discussion is meaningful and brainstorming, why would we need to stop? We are talking about punishing the player trained to have a good free throw shooter. Under the new formula they should have even better %. We are only talking about to include the three point. What are you mad at? -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.3 5.4 timmy296701

We are *not talking about punishing -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 6.30 ratun

Gudrioji Lape wrote
"why to remove impact of experience? i believe this should be a factor?"

You probably could take it like that: from the Experience skill definition:

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/Pagalba-sarasas.htm#hlpanc_2094
It's essentially an opposing factor. Which wouldn't quite transcribe in free throw shooting.
Maybe the "not to panic" aspect of it, but then again, not a strictly opposing factor.
Or you consider it a battle against yourself. In which case experience would negate itself.
Though maybe Psychology skill of a coach would be of better help in that regard. Which it might already be. -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

Y 3 Liverduk

The FT skill should just be the player accuracy skill - combination of all 3 shooting skills. With perhaps more weight on 2m and 3p than 2c, so not exactly average. Or just average of 2m and 3p, which is more realistic because of all the centers that shoot 60%+ around the rim and can't shoot at all from anywhere else.
Also, keep in mind that first and second free throw percentage differs. Since 1997, NBA players have shot 73% on their first free throw. They shoot 78% on their second free throw. That is a significant difference for that much data. -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.1 TheWizardKs

I would like to see defense actually start being an influence. We have never given up 65% of 2pt shots until this year. Please release exactly what internal things you have changed. -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 joancrumor

Every week is a surprise in the game, and we've been testing the game engine for the past three seasons. I have to be critical of the management because I am a victim of all this -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.1 ak904

The free throw shooting percentage is worse than before in national leagues match today. -- 89 sez. 25 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 3.4 dwyane3

gudrioji lape experience has been taken off mainly to motivate managers to train mid-range shooting more and experience skill played too much of a role. We have made the changes in the testing ME and see if it works or not.

konapan the tricky part with involving other skills is that if we put, say 30% influence of 3pt shooting skill to FT percentage, if the player has 12 mid range shooting skill but 1 three point shooting skill he is not going to be shooting as well as he should. Also a number of managers have been training their players' mid-range game and adding other skills would undermine their choice. Getting you players' mid-range game to skill 8 should do just fine to get around 70% accuracy.

Frankebasta Yes, we are not native English speakers and our language may not be grammatically perfect. We are always looking for volunteers to help us make the game better, would you like to help us? If so, please contact us by DM.

Liverduk the difference between first and second shot accuracy is a nice-to-have feature, we would like to find the best way to make FT work and then we could go into more detailed updates.

TheWizardKs thank you, we will make this our next topic. Any other suggestions? :) -- 89 sez. 25 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

How about the PG fouls? Its increíble how the 30 players with more fouls pero Game are PG. I do not remember (but were a lot) how many matches I ended playoñing without a PG because the 2 are out -- 89 sez. 27 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.8 4.5 McGod

dwyane3, why do You think player, who are not capable to make a 3pt shot, should have excellent free throw accuracy? Your argument make no sense. -- 89 sez. 27 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

Rodyti paslėptus atsakymus: 25

1.1 3.4 fungtys

Michael Jordan -- 89 sez. 28 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 3.4 dwyane3

ulipulido yes, there is definitely somewhat not working as expected in terms of PG fouls committed. We are planning to tweak shooting first and then we will move on to this issue.

McGod Yes, that would be weird, that a player making a lot of 3 pointers would be a bad free throw shooter at the top level. In order to shoot threes at a high percentage the players must practice many hours to achieve this skill. If the only thing that a player did was practicing threes, he would be decent at shooting it but that does not mean he would be as good with any other skill, including free throws. I can't imagine top level player skipping free throw drills in the practice because he has already shot 200 three-pointers that day. Practicing FTs is a hygiene that must be done in order to achieve the desired result. -- 89 sez. 28 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 mancuso

It's incredible, it seems made by enemies, every time they touch something the game gets worse -- 89 sez. 28 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.2 3.1 Onions

Žaidėjas: Raimundas Gizmaila (VK: 46)

-- 89 sez. 28 d.

Klubas nusamdė skauto surastą žaidėją

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.2 3.1 a-ramune

Žaidimo naujienos: Rungtynių varikliuko atnaujinimas

-- 88 sez. 61 d.

New match engine will be used in the game from the next season! We recommend reading all the available information - so that you would be as ready as possible for the upcoming season.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.8 cikane

Where should we read?:) I think posting the links would be helpful -- 88 sez. 61 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.5 bananajohn

Just press "Match engine update" link and there is all info inside :) -- 88 sez. 61 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.2 Lipinski

those who can read are clearly at an advantage xD -- 88 sez. 61 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.3 3.1 rurutis

oh my.. -- 88 sez. 61 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 2.1 Aurimas.

Looks like its impossible to defend agains low posts in the new ME despite the fact that I have way better centers.
All these matches I used defence focus on low posts:

Rungtynės 86 % (18/21)

Rungtynės 92 % (11/12)

Rungtynės 83 % (15/18)

Rungtynės 61 % (14/23)
can't notice any difference if Im using defence focus on shooters :) -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 3.3 Partizanas

O tai Lietuviškai info nebebus ? :O -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 mancuso

We are precisely waiting from the Administration for clear information on how to deal with this new engine; To which we should add that from WL2 onwards it is often impossible to have teams of 10 players due to a salary issue that should be resolved -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.5 bananajohn

it'd not the game creators fault that players are too expensive... It's players themselves who put the price. -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.5 bananajohn

Myself i just lost a tall guy who became just too expensive. What surprised me wasn't the money but the league he is going. He goes to a 4WL team which will pay him about 25 percent of all incoming money. Add the numbers and of course you won't be able to have 10 players. Well you in 1WL can't compare with that... -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.3 a-darius

mancuso:
Please read again about the economic of the game.

https://www.basketpulse.com/en/News/article/607c340611c39/economic-model-of-basketpulse -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 mancuso

Darius, you can tell me everything you want, but that is actually impracticable, because no team from WL2 to the minor leagues can have a team of 9/10 players because it is impossible for them to renew their own player. And you don't want to understand reasons -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 HeyHoudini

The only reason why everything is expensive is only managers. It's not admins/market/games/scouts/coaches/players/some divine power - it's fully managers, it's us who participate in market, bid some crazy amounts and end up increasing avg. Salary which leads extending not being to our liking. "It's not cheap to extend". No shit Sherlock, those 100k bids on some players increased some C prices from avg on 35k up to 60k.

What ya'll want? Darius giving everyone more money? Only leads increasing salaries more. We all want best players at cheapest price. I don't see LeBron James, Steph Curry, KD or other NBA superstars going "oh shit, I will just extend my contract for minimum salary, I don't care about those 200+mil on the table, will play for 1mil per season".

It is the reality - we all bid crazy in the market which DIRECTLY increased avg prices and we all have to pay.

Not Darius "doesn't want to understand" - it's all of you, that want to have 10 LeBrons for less than minimum wage. -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

+17

1.1 1.1 mancuso

First Houdini you overdid it a bit and taking us all for fools, I think Darius doesn't need a lawyer either. On the other hand what you say is a great stupidity and also a lie; because put aside those of us who are in WL1, let's go to the minor leagues and I'm going to give you a clear example so that even you understand it; You start with 10 players from your school, they reach the main team and by the third renewal you already have to do without someone because you can't sustain them. And it's not all Genius managers who make salaries increase, hopefully there will be 5 or 6 who can pay large amounts, -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 mancuso

and I'm going to take the trouble to go team by team, and league by league to show you that you're lying -- 88 sez. 62 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.1 3.4 Intelygentas

Heyhoudini. Sveikinu. Ka tik pasiekiai nerealu propagandos lygi. Tas ner blogai, jei nori dirbti valdziai. Bet… Liaudis/tauta, paprastai, laukia kitokiu žinių iš “Prezidentu”. O būtent: valdžia bloga, nieko nesupranta ir pan. Kitaip tariant bandymas uztart, kad reikia 12 žaidėju kaip minimum ir nieko nedarysim nes kalti žaidėjai/liaudis, kvepia labai jau Stalinizmu, arba, pagal jūsų jaunimo paniatkes, Putinizmu… P. S. Blemba kaip gaila, kad Šabas uzbanintas, paaiškintų geriau nei aš… -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.2 Lipinski

Ihr habt alle Probleme, ey.

Ihr solltet euch alle mal vor Augen führen, dass das hier alles nur ein Spiel ist.

Es soll mit einem Basketball Hintergrund in erster Linie Spaß machen und zu netten Bekanntschaften führen. So das man mal dem Alltag entfliehen kann.

Ihr feindet euch an, als ob Leben davon abhängen.
Kommt mal wieder klar und chillt mal ne Runde.

Peace out! -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 Liverduk

Well, I'm not in wl1 nor wl2, but I do understand that a real life team is constructed of stars and role players. And real life teams also have problems extending their own players sometimes because of the salary cap. Most they can get is 3 superstara but in that case, the rest of the team is garbage because of the cap.
From what I' m reading, some of you are complaining that you can't have a team of 10 players, but in reality, you don't want a team of 10 players. You want a team of 10 all stars. I'm all for larger rosters where you have to find some cheap role players to make the finances work. -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

+12

1.1 1.1 mancuso

Liverduk no one wants 10 super stars , but only good players , and I tell you too , if I train 10 players from school , and let 's say no LeBron , but only useful players , at some point you are going to lose because you are not going to be able to renew their contracts -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 mancuso

And why then do you have a squad of only 8 players? If it were as easy as you say it should be 12 -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 fanling3

I can't believe these guys keep saying the same thing when I was in WL5 and they are still repeating them now
If you are below WL2, and you have trouble renewing your players because you can't afford the salary, you are playing this game in a wrong way -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.1 nerdageddon

I’m just quick mathing but at 3 resigns per season of scouted talent at 5S each and properly assigned into their tier in the resign wave you should be able to properly juggle 12 talents over their life time. Mix in 2 draft playera and the salaries can work. Time for everyone to evolve or die. -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.1 nerdageddon

That’d mean probably raising talents in pods (4 finished vet stars, 4health bankers/YT Grads, 2Draft, - next wave of 4 in YT to replace vets). -- 88 sez. 63 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

Y 1 david1992

Is it possible to lower the tiredness in only youth league games? Since the tiredness will affect a player’s training. -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 3.4 dwyane3

No, you need to have full squad everywhere. -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.4 4.5 Rutuliukas

Kas čia per nuo vargiai tokie, nlb ikertu? 10 žaidėjų po lygiai liko, blyn po 60-75 % nusikaltimo pirmose sezono varžybose? Ar čia viskas gerai? -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 2.1 andriuss

Rungtynės zaidejas zarudnevas baige su 6prazangom varzybas -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.8 4.2 Mant1sz

Įdomus sezonas nusimato... -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

6.3 6.4 Saltalankis

Aš manau,kad reikėtų padaryti taip, kad komanda turėtų sudėtyje minimum 10-12 ar net 14 žaidėjų. Dabar komandos turi 7-8 žaidėjus ir lygiavertiškai daužosi su visais.. Niekur taip nėra realiai. Tegul padaro, kad registruoti būtų galima minimum 7 rungtynėse, bet komandoje reikia turėti minimum 10-12. Tada biški pareguliuotų komandų sudėtis, nebūtų vien tik superstarai, nes dabar 1 lygos komandos atrodo apgailėtinai su panašaus VK sudėtimis.. -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.3 a-darius

andriuss:
Thank you!
Probably I found the problem and fixed directly inside main engine (v. 1.1.01) -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 1.1 Gudrioji Lape

Wow, missed such a nice discussion :) i agree partly with houdini - everyone wants 10 Lebrons, however the really artificial thing is minimum salary - completely doesnt go with real life. In economy, it is considered healthy when ratio of minimum wage divided by average is at or below 50%. What is such ratio in basketpulse? Second, what is the share of players getting minimum or below wage? And how does it look by leagues? What unemployment rate does this create? Some players from drafts might be recruited maybe even different skillsets tried, but their high rating would push up the min wage where its not worth it.
Too much illogical things are now based on this players rating, which with drafts introduction makes even less sense now - min wage, strength rating… -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 Mirza

Houdini and Lape have the same opinion. Can it be only coincidence? -- 89 sez. 2 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 1.1 HeyHoudini

Definitely not the same user/brother/cousin/coworker/close-friend/wife/sister/mother/father.. -- 89 sez. 3 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.4 4.4 nesakysiu

Saltalankis
gali ir 50 tureti, bet neimanoma suvaldyti, kai PG po krepsiu ginasi pries C, arba kai baudas meto komanda (ir varzovu) 50 proc. Cia mano paskutinis sezonas sitame zaidime, netrinu dabar komandos, nes yra pasiskolintas zaidejas, islauksiu sezono galo. Buvo geras zaidimas, bet primaste nesamoniu ir bega visi zaidejai. jau esu sakes, leiskit nauja ta varikliuka, bet palikite ir sena ant kito domeno, zmones pasirinks kur zaisti, bet niekam neidomu.... -- 89 sez. 3 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.4 3.4 dwyane3

O kokie žaidėjų vidutinio nuotolio metimo skillai, kurie baudas mėto po 50 procentų? -- 89 sez. 3 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.4 4.5 Rutuliukas

Kažko jus cia nepykit, bet nusivažiavot su tais naujais varikliukas. Ne pinigų neis sutaupyt, nes reik daugiau žaidėjų, nznz,..... -- 89 sez. 3 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.4 4.5 Rutuliukas

Ginybos nustatymai, tai padėk dieve, seni buvo super, čia blyn nesuprasi nk, kas ką kaip gins.... -- 89 sez. 3 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 spiderman

i have lost last period 17-8 against a Team with 4 men with 40 minutes....no tiredeness here ?!?!??!?! -- 89 sez. 4 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

4.5 4.6 Shapras

Tai didžiausias nesusipratimas šiame žaidime. Žaidėjai surinkti pagal praeito sezono varikliuką. Buvo lyderiai, dabar vidutiniokai nors algos milžiniškos.
Buvo perimtų kamuolių svarba treniruojant gynybos iq. Koks dabar tikslas kelti iki pvz 12? Jokio.
Atrodo jau buvau perprates sistema, o dabar jaučiuosi kaip naujokas, kuris turi viska pradeti is naujo. Nebesuprantu ko reikia, kad rinktu taskus. Neaisku kaip apsiginti su taktikom. Kazkokia xuine.
Manau,, kad neteisingas sprendimas taip drastiskai viska pakeisti per viena sezona, nes dauguma kas zaidzia jauciasi pasimete. Pokyciai turi buti palaipsniui ir aiskus. Manau, kad zaidimas ne progresuoja, o regresas.
Labai gaila.
Taip ir norisi visus zaidejus atleisti, kristi i 6 lyga ir meginti adaptuotis su nauja sistema prie minimaliu nuostoliu, o ne prie dideliu algu. Arba mesti si zaidima -- 89 sez. 4 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

3.1 2.1 darys

Ne per 1 sezoną viskas pasikeitė. Naujas varikliukas buvo testuojamas nacionalinėje lygoje kelis sezonus. -- 89 sez. 4 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

5.6 5.12 MrJBJ

Puikios naujovės! Gal ir yra spragų, bet viskas eina geryn. 7-8 žaidėjų komandos, buvo krepšinio parodija...
Pykstantys žmonės primena tuos, kurie pasiima paskolą ir skundžiasi, kad palūkanas reikia mokėti... -- 89 sez. 4 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

6.3 6.4 Saltalankis

Truputį nesąmonė, kad dingo taktikoje gynybos stilius. Gerai, akcentas yra gintis prieš geriausius įgūdžius turintį žaidėją, bet gal dar mano akcentas yra išsidėstyti zona, kad geriau dėl kamuolių pakovoti? Kodėl panaikintos standartinės taktikos? -- 89 sez. 4 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 spiderman

MrJBJ....why i lost against a team with 4 player for 40minutes ?!?!?!!? tell me....and i have 9 players..... -- 89 sez. 5 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 fanling3

spiderman The tiredness of your players are too high so basically you have almost no advantage from having more players -- 89 sez. 5 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

6.32 6.12 Blackacid

Maybe at the season start they can win with 4 players playing 40 minutes, but i hope this engine won't let them win in the middle of the season. -- 89 sez. 5 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 spiderman

@ fanling3....the tiredness of my players was after yesterday game...they were all green before the match -- 89 sez. 5 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 spiderman

Blackacid...maybe !?!?!?!?!?! you have to change when u are sure that all the things goes well....now they can win & in the middle no ? this is not a regular season if so..... -- 89 sez. 5 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.3 Movida

The aim of the new game engine was to make everything more realistic. In some respects it has become .Teams that win by fielding only 4 players are not. -- 89 sez. 6 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.1 TheWizardKs

spiderman ... that is crazy as the team you played should have been winded during the 2nd and 4th quarters, yet they did better. I think the game is still not where it needs to be. -- 89 sez. 6 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 joancrumor

Hi, I have waited a few games, I have read many comments and my conclusion is that we do not know the game engine, the new game engine is to improve or to please part of the users. I´m totally disappointed with the game, my time and economy in helping to improve this game does not satisfy me as a user, it is my modest opinion -- 89 sez. 13 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

Nobody likes the new engine. To random and táctics with no influence at all. I tried same táctics with a colleague in 3 matches, same everything and results are opossite -- 89 sez. 13 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.3 Melena7

A mi me gusta muchísimo -- 89 sez. 14 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 joancrumor

Gran desarrollo de opinión del nuevo motor, alguna explicacion que aclare por que te gusta muchísimo?, por curiosidad -- 89 sez. 14 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 mikecuc

For me it's being impossible to understand the new engine, and hard to discern how to set "defensive focus" because it happenned in several games that when defending shooters, the opponent got higher % in 3p or defending low post, the % of opponent's close range was even higher than his average. Does CS and DIQ work with the new engine? It seems that nobody defends with the new engine.
Why a player plays 35 minutes in one game and 18 minutes in other, if reccommended time and positions are the same for all the team in both matches, and there is no influence of fouls (in both matches 3 or less the players selected for the same positions)?
Whay if you set attacking low post, you take more 3p shots than close range shots, even if now zone defenses can't be set?
Another point, how is "shot quality ratio" calculated? Which skills from attacking and defending players and coaches are being considerated to estimate this "shot quality ratio"? It's being annoying seing how a 218cm player with good offensive skills for 3p shots (12 in jump and 3p, 11 in speed, 9 in dribling, 8 in passing and 10 in OIQ), is always shooting with a negative "shot quality", no matter which opponent is defending (height, skills or experience). Even with a "players skills ratio" of 4 or 5 and better coaches for the team that is attacking!!! In my opinion, SQ should be calculated considering players skills, not if a 218cm player is playing as SF, PF or C (Porzingis is a good example). If attacker skills are better than defender skills to generate the situation for shooting, he may shot with positive SQR.
I've read the help in the game's webpage and in the #shot-results topic in discord, and maybe i'm not as smart as other people, but even after reading, i continue not understanding how SQR works...

And the last point, why the atmosphere influence when playing at home now has been decreased so bad? It's being easier win a game as visitant than playing at home...
What i've said at the beggining, it's being impossible to understand the new engine, and it may cause the loss of interest for many users.
Sorry for the lenght of my writing, but i felt that i had to say it -- 89 sez. 20 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.1 ulipulido

Same questions as

mikecuc , its not possible to understand some points of the NE -- 89 sez. 20 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 fanling3

mikecuc It is surprising that you ask why your 218 always has bad shot quality ratio but you can still reach WL2. I suggest you to read the help section 3 more times -- 89 sez. 20 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 mikecuc

Maybe you can teach me... ?
If the game is trying to be realistic, tall players with high speed, jump, Dribbling, OIQ and 3p, shall shot in better situations. I'm not questioning about the help section, I'm questioning that if the game is to be realistic, it must be realistic for everything -- 89 sez. 20 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 fanling3

It's not about skills. Look at your 218's position.
But I do agree forcing player position according to height is a bit outdated. 198cm Draymond Green can play C in real life. -- 89 sez. 20 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 3.2 joancrumor

hi, after the last games I'm tired of everything, I've already assumed that the game is random, worse than the previous one, the new engine, tactics, tiredness, training, etc, is a big mistake, every day the game goes by it drifts, it's unreal, the defenses don't work, etc. I really appreciate the effort to improve and maintain Darius's game, but he must understand the users, every change he makes is a step behind the game. Example, today out of boredom I didn't do the tactic, they played randomly and I won, explain it to me, it doesn't deserve to study the teams, the results are random, the tactics are useless, etc.
I don't want to bother you anymore, I'll stay in the game because I have a job to do with the federation, etc, they've been collaborating for many years, but I'm very tired of everything that happens in the game, goodbye and good luck to those who have more confidence than me , it is my humble opinion -- 89 sez. 21 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.2 3.3 a-darius

Honestly we had similar messages when the previous ME were introduced. And the one before it. And it was quite what we expected with this update.

Some of you wrote that the ME is not the same as it was in the last season's national leagues. That is not true, that is exactly the same ME that you were testing the previous season.

The old tactics (that you miss) were completely removed from the new match engine a few seasons ago and we informed community about that at that moment.

Of course there will be updates regarding calibration of tactics and so on.
At the moment what we need from you is quality feedback and a bit of patience.

By looking at these messages I don't see any of these. If some of you writes a good feedback, there are big chances that it will be lost in all this noise.

So for those who really care - please send your suggestions as a “message to administration”.

Thank you. -- 89 sez. 21 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 2.2 fanling3

PG are having too many fouls than other positions. When you look at the league stat top ranking, like 80% of them are PG -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

2.1 2.1 ekstrasensas

About PG fouls it is totally ridiculous. -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

Rodyti paslėptus atsakymus: 61

3.2 3.4 Ignas1521

Ar planuojama gražinti zonines gynybas į žaidimą? :D nes dabar toks jausmas, kad turint 5 žaidėjus su 12C starte ir nepataikius neivieno tritaškio per visą sezoną galima laimėt lygą. Kažkaip pries sistemą mes čia einam. Taip pat klausimas dėl dvigubų licenzijų, kodėl negalim tokio dalyko turėt žaidime? jeigu jau keliam nuovargį, tai kodėl negalime turėti 1-3 žaidėjų kurie žaistų su dvigubom licenzijom tiek Youth League tiek Pagrindinėj komandoje. -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.3 Frankebasta

Rungtynės

By the commentary, it looks like Muli never got the ball back after the Free Thows.
Even if no ball exchange was done after the inbound pass, at least it should read:
0:00 Muli
It doesn't

4Q 0:08 Muli Team is trying to stop the clock with tactical foul
4Q 0:07 Muli Tactical foul (5 f ): M. Kalichan
4Q 0:07 Gyva Foul against: K. Rymolaitis
4Q 0:07 Muli logotipas Substitution out (fouls' limit exceeded): M. Kalichan ( PG)
4Q 0:07 Muli logotipas Substitution in: A. Crocchiolo ( PG)
73:75 4Q 0:07 Gyva logotipas Free throw: K. Rymolaitis
73:76 4Q 0:07 Gyva logotipas Free throw: K. Rymolaitis
4Q 0:00 Gyva End of the period -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

1.1 4.3 Frankebasta

Rungtynės

we don't know which player stole the ball, or if it was travelling or a pass out of bounds:

4Q 0:49 PDM Player rushes to organize an attack: M. Šavija
4Q 0:47 Muli Pressing gave its fruits - ball stolen
4Q 0:47 PDM logotipas Ball lost: M. Šavija
4Q 0:40 Muli Player consumes time and holds attack: R. Paguinto -- 89 sez. 24 d.

-- (Versti) (Versti EN)

Lietuva.3.1	12 Vieta x 1
World League.3.1	30 Vieta x 1
National Men-3	4 Vieta Lebanon Men

Klubo informacija

The Onions

Vietinis pavadinimas: Cibuliai

Informacija

Reitingai

Statistika

Svarbiausi pasiekimai

88 Sezonas

87 Sezonas

Klubo informacija

The Onions

Vietinis pavadinimas: Cibuliai

Informacija

Reitingai

Statistika

Svarbiausi pasiekimai

88 Sezonas

87 Sezonas

Greitoji pagalba

Pranešti apie netinkamą pranešimą